威斯康星卡片分类测试
等价(形式语言)
心理测量学
心理学
项目反应理论
测试有效性
卡片分类
集合(抽象数据类型)
考试(生物学)
验证试验
统计
认知心理学
临床心理学
认知
精神科
数学
神经心理学
计算机科学
经济
管理
程序设计语言
古生物学
离散数学
生物
任务(项目管理)
作者
Jean‐Paul Steinmetz,Martin Brunner,Even Loarer,Claude Houssemand
摘要
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) assesses executive and frontal lobe function and can be administered manually or by computer. Despite the widespread application of the 2 versions, the psychometric equivalence of their scores has rarely been evaluated and only a limited set of criteria has been considered. The present experimental study (N = 100 healthy adults) therefore examined the psychometric equivalence of 4 scores (i.e., Total Correct, Percentage of Errors, Perseverative Errors, and Failure-to-Maintain-Set) obtained on the 2 versions of the WCST in terms of 4 key criteria identified within the framework of classical test theory. The results showed considerable differences in variances, small to modest parallel-forms reliability coefficients, and small to modest temporal stability coefficients. Taken together, our results suggest that scores on the manual version and the computer version of the WCST show incomplete psychometric equivalence.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI