What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature

构造(python库) 护理研究 一致性(知识库) 意义(存在) 心理学 概念框架 口译(哲学) 计算机科学 社会学 医学 护理部 社会科学 人工智能 心理治疗师 程序设计语言
作者
Kathy Davis,Nicholas Drey,Dinah J. Gould
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:46 (10): 1386-1400 被引量:944
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010
摘要

Scoping studies are increasingly undertaken as distinct activities. The interpretation, methodology and expectations of scoping are highly variable. This suggests that conceptually, scoping is a poorly defined ambiguous term. The distinction between scoping as an integral preliminary process in the development of a research proposal or a formative, methodologically rigorous activity in its own right has not been extensively examined.The aim of this review is to explore the nature and status of scoping studies within the nursing literature and develop a working definition to ensure consistency in the future use of scoping as a research related activity.This paper follows an interpretative scoping review methodology.An explicit systematic search strategy included literary and web-based key word searches and advice from key researchers. Electronic sources included bibliographic and national research register databases and a general browser.The scoping studies varied widely in terms of intent, procedural and methodological rigor. An atheoretical stance was common although explicit conceptual clarification and development of a topic was limited. Four different levels of inquiry ranging from preliminary descriptive surveys to more substantive conceptual approaches were conceptualised. These levels reflected differing dimensional distinctions in which some activities constitute research whereas in others the scoping activities appear to fall outside the remit of research. Reconnaissance emerges as a common synthesising construct to explain the purpose of scoping.Scoping studies in relation to nursing are embryonic and continue to evolve. Its main strengths lie in its ability to extract the essence of a diverse body of evidence giving it meaning and significance that is both developmental and intellectually creative. As with other approaches to research and evidence synthesis a more standardized approach is required.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Mikasaaaaa完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
hyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
纯真驳回了乐乐的应助
1秒前
peng发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
完美世界的应助被王菁炫采纳,获得10
6秒前
桐桐的应助被昭蘅采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
风雨完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
星业辰发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
jason0023发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
小吴完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
实验人完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
欢快的芹菜完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
丘比特的应助被lulu采纳,获得20
13秒前
clamdown发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
orange9发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
丘比特的应助被aa采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
赘婿的应助被卡卡西采纳,获得10
15秒前
东起欧发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
唐贵完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
曹文鹏发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
hyyyy完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
尊敬书本发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
cake完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
xiaofeixia完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
march发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
风格的应助被阿拉采纳,获得20
20秒前
theThreeMagi发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
null的应助被刘海青采纳,获得10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
Analyses de reconnaissances de dettes passées devant les échevins d'Ypres (1249-1291) 600
拉伸高分子熔体中缠结行为的模拟和小角中子散射研究 600
Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives: Synthesis, Modification and Applications 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8141308
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9541246
关于积分的说明 21644686
捐赠科研通 7725328
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3421265
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2546506
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2463448