What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature

构造(python库) 护理研究 一致性(知识库) 意义(存在) 心理学 概念框架 口译(哲学) 计算机科学 社会学 医学 护理部 社会科学 人工智能 心理治疗师 程序设计语言
作者
Kathy Davis,Nick Drey,Dinah Gould
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:46 (10): 1386-1400 被引量:850
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010
摘要

Scoping studies are increasingly undertaken as distinct activities. The interpretation, methodology and expectations of scoping are highly variable. This suggests that conceptually, scoping is a poorly defined ambiguous term. The distinction between scoping as an integral preliminary process in the development of a research proposal or a formative, methodologically rigorous activity in its own right has not been extensively examined.The aim of this review is to explore the nature and status of scoping studies within the nursing literature and develop a working definition to ensure consistency in the future use of scoping as a research related activity.This paper follows an interpretative scoping review methodology.An explicit systematic search strategy included literary and web-based key word searches and advice from key researchers. Electronic sources included bibliographic and national research register databases and a general browser.The scoping studies varied widely in terms of intent, procedural and methodological rigor. An atheoretical stance was common although explicit conceptual clarification and development of a topic was limited. Four different levels of inquiry ranging from preliminary descriptive surveys to more substantive conceptual approaches were conceptualised. These levels reflected differing dimensional distinctions in which some activities constitute research whereas in others the scoping activities appear to fall outside the remit of research. Reconnaissance emerges as a common synthesising construct to explain the purpose of scoping.Scoping studies in relation to nursing are embryonic and continue to evolve. Its main strengths lie in its ability to extract the essence of a diverse body of evidence giving it meaning and significance that is both developmental and intellectually creative. As with other approaches to research and evidence synthesis a more standardized approach is required.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
zll发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
zll发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
苏州河发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
zll发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
zll发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
烟花应助夏儿采纳,获得10
1秒前
李哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ding应助xuan采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
万能小包发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
2秒前
su完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
dewattLi完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
无辜澜完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
健壮鸡翅发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
慈祥的白玉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
任性新儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
苏州河发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
香蕉觅云应助刘xiansheng采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
诚心的丹秋完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ikun发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
ccg发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
汉堡包应助渔泽采纳,获得10
9秒前
stupid发布了新的文献求助200
9秒前
Havoc发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小马甲应助鱼瓜瓜采纳,获得10
10秒前
Darling完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
大辉发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
宇宙粉红闪电完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
浪烨完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助oo采纳,获得30
11秒前
ali发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
华仔应助万能小包采纳,获得30
12秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
How to Use Machine Learning in Chemistry: An Introduction 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7582625
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9161560
关于积分的说明 19603854
捐赠科研通 7164839
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3266176
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2431084
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2257468