医学
内科学
四分位间距
优势比
危险系数
置信区间
不利影响
安慰剂
糖尿病
风险因素
Evolocumab公司
低风险
随机对照试验
中止
瑞舒伐他汀
临床试验
无症状的
心脏病学
混淆
绝对风险降低
冲程(发动机)
他汀类
2型糖尿病
亚临床感染
随机化
外科
2型糖尿病
四分位数
逻辑回归
作者
Baris Gencer,Robert P Giugliano,Xinhui Ran,François Mach,Erik S G Stroes,Ioanna Gouni-Berthold,R Češka,Marat V Ezhov,J Wouter Jukema,Henrik Kjærulf Jensen,S Lale Tokgözoğlu,Kurt Huber,KyungAh Im,Marc S Sabatine,Michelle L O’Donoghue
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehag398
摘要
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is considered a causal risk factor for atherogenesis. A higher prevalence of certain adverse events, including diabetes mellitus (DM), has been reported for patients with low Lp(a) concentrations. Therapeutics that lower Lp(a) are now in clinical testing. Thus, the association between lower Lp(a) concentration and safety outcomes is of clinical importance. METHODS: The FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk) trial randomized 27 564 patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) to evolocumab versus placebo on a background of statin therapy. The relationship between Lp(a) and the risk of prevalent and incident adverse outcomes of interest was examined, adjusting for relevant predictors. RESULTS: Lp(a) was assessed in 25 090 participants at baseline (median 37 nmol/L, interquartile range 13-165). There was no association between Lp(a) concentration and incident risk of haemorrhagic stroke, serious bleeding, neurocognitive events, malignancy, or atrial fibrillation, including those with Lp(a) levels ≤13 nmol/L. There was an inverse association between lower baseline Lp(a) levels and prevalent DM at baseline (adjusted odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.04, P < .001; for every 50 nmol/L lower Lp(a)), as well as the incident risk of developing DM during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, P = .002; for every 50 nmol/L lower Lp(a)), with consistent results by treatment arm. Evolocumab did not increase the risk of DM irrespective of baseline Lp(a), even in participants in the top decile of baseline Lp(a) (adjusted HR .72, 95% CI .38-1.35) in whom evolocumab reduced Lp(a) by a median of 71 nmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ASCVD, low Lp(a) concentration was not associated with an increased risk of most adverse safety outcomes, but lower Lp(a) was associated with an increased risk of prevalent and incident DM.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI