亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Responding to reviewers: Advice to young (and some older) authors

上诉 集合(抽象数据类型) 点(几何) 相关性(法律) 质量(理念) 范围(计算机科学) 医学 建议(编程) 计算机科学 法学 认识论 政治学 程序设计语言 哲学 几何学 数学
作者
Dirk M. Elston
出处
期刊:Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:80 (4): 901-901 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.012
摘要

Reviewers give generously of their time and talent to improve the quality of medical journals, and the peer review process works best in an atmosphere of mutual respect and cooperation.•Interpret each comment as friendly advice. Do not become defensive.•Make appropriate changes in response to each comment, and include a point-by-point discussion of the changes in a cover letter. If the changes are straightforward, the editor can accept them without the need for further layers of review. If the issues are more complex, the manuscript is more likely to be returned to the reviewers for a second look.•You do not have to make every change requested by the reviewers, but be careful to explain why you feel the change is inappropriate or beyond the scope of the manuscript.•Be concise—adding paragraphs can result in a bloated discussion, and readers can get lost in the details. In most cases, necessary additions can be balanced by deletions of repetitive or unnecessary text. It can be frustrating when a reviewer does not seem to understand the relevance of your work, and authors have a right to appeal an editorial decision. Contact the journal office, editor, or deputy editor if you want to appeal a decision. Explain why you feel the decision was in error and the impact the article could have on clinical outcomes. Typically, the editor will assign a fresh set of reviewers, but take heed of the reviewers’ comments and make revisions where appropriate before resubmission. If basic flaws in the manuscript have not been addressed, the outcome is commonly unchanged. Remember, “insanity” has been described as taking the same actions again and again, expecting a different outcome. Perhaps the best way to learn how to respond to reviewers is to become a reviewer yourself. It can be satisfying to contribute to the vetting of scientific literature, and reviewing articles can make you a better author. If you want to perform reviews for the journal, visit http://www.editorialmanager.com/jaad and click on “Register Now” to register your areas of interest.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
12秒前
38秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
辉辉应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
俭朴蜜蜂完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
wanci应助Tingshuo采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Future完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
李娇完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
德拉科发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
兴尽晚回舟完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
灵巧的代芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
Raunio完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
德拉科完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Basic And Clinical Science Course 2025-2026 3000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 880
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
Stop Talking About Wellbeing: A Pragmatic Approach to Teacher Workload 500
Terminologia Embryologica 500
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5617095
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4701461
关于积分的说明 14913699
捐赠科研通 4749054
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2549285
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1512345
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1474091