Catastrophizing: A Risk Factor For Postsurgical Pain

医学 剧痛 止痛药 物理疗法 骨关节炎 疼痛量表 类阿片 麻醉 慢性疼痛 内科学 病理 受体 替代医学
作者
D. Janet Pavlin,Michael Sullivan,Peter R. Freund,Kristine Roesen
出处
期刊:The Clinical Journal of Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:21 (1): 83-90 被引量:335
标识
DOI:10.1097/00002508-200501000-00010
摘要

OBJECTIVE: This research was designed to test the hypothesis that presurgery "catastrophizing" would predict postsurgical pain and postsurgical analgesic consumption. METHODS: A sample of 48 individuals who underwent anterior cruciate ligament repair participated in the study. All participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (described by Sullivan et al in 1995) prior to surgery. Measures of pain (pain scores on a scale of 0-10) were obtained in the postanesthetic care unit, as well as 1, 2, and 7 days after surgery. Opioid and nonopioid analgesic consumption was tabulated while patients were in the hospital and after discharge. RESULTS: Results showed that the Pain Catastrophizing Scale was a significant predictor of acute postsurgical pain in the postanesthetic care unit (r = 0.48, P = 0.004 for maximum pain in the postanesthetic care unit). Maximum pain ratings in patients with high Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores (> median of 13) were 33% to 74% higher numerically than in patients with low Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores (< or = median), and the duration of moderate-severe pain (>3/10) was more prolonged (45 minutes versus 28 minutes in patients with high and low Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores, respectively; P < 0.05). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was also predictive of pain with activity at 24 hours (r = 0.65 for pain on walking, P < or = 0.0001). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale did not predict postoperative analgesic use. CONCLUSION: The pattern of findings suggests that high catastrophizing scores may be a risk factor for heightened pain following surgery. Clinical and theoretical implications of the findings are addressed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Xenia完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
墨月完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
polaris完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
顾矜应助奋斗哥采纳,获得30
3秒前
3秒前
小龙长眠完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
8秒前
某某完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
AxiE完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
深情安青应助榛糕李采纳,获得20
11秒前
叫瓦达西土块完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
无情的聋五完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
益笙鸿老板完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
长弓诘完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
mei人鱼发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
wyx完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
塔塔完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
慕青应助AthurMarcus采纳,获得10
18秒前
wqh应助炸薯条采纳,获得30
18秒前
20秒前
兴奋的友灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
云间宿发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
24秒前
pjy完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
Claire完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
26秒前
libby完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助20
28秒前
Luuu完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
28秒前
longtengfei完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
虚心的砖家完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
Caiyuping完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
zxd1999完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
Lou发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
A Psychological Understanding of Criticism and Mental Health 600
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7750930
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9298459
关于积分的说明 20246346
捐赠科研通 7333133
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3309783
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461331
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2322324