Pegcetacoplan versus eculizumab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PEGASUS): 48-week follow-up of a randomised, open-label, phase 3, active-comparator, controlled trial

伊库利珠单抗 医学 内科学 临床终点 养生 随机对照试验 打开标签 临床试验 抗体 免疫学 补体系统
作者
Régis Peffault de Latour,Jeff Szer,Ilene C. Weitz,Alexander Röth,Britta Höchsmann,Jens Panse,Kensuke Usuki,Morag Griffin,Jean‐Jacques Kiladjian,Carlos M. de Castro,Hisakazu Nishimori,Temitayo Ajayi,Mohammed Al-Adhami,Pascal Deschatelets,Cedric Francois,F Grossi,Antonio M. Risitano,Peter Hillmen
出处
期刊:The Lancet Haematology [Elsevier]
卷期号:9 (9): e648-e659 被引量:53
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00210-1
摘要

Summary

Background

In the PEGASUS trial, the complement C3 inhibitor, pegcetacoplan, showed superiority to eculizumab in improving haematological outcomes in adult patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and suboptimal response to eculizumab at 16 weeks. The aim of the open-label period was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of pegcetacoplan through to 48 weeks.

Methods

PEGASUS was a phase 3, randomised, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial conducted in 44 centres in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, and had a haemoglobin concentration of less than 10·50 g/dL after 3 months or longer of stable eculizumab treatment. After a 4-week run-in with eculizumab plus pegcetacoplan, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by interactive response technology to pegcetacoplan (1080 mg subcutaneously twice weekly) or eculizumab (according to their regimen at enrolment) for 16 weeks and could continue to the open-label period (32 weeks of pegcetacoplan monotherapy [pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan] or 28 weeks of pegcetacoplan monotherapy [eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan]). Randomisation was stratified by platelet count and number of previous blood transfusions. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in haemoglobin at week 16, which has previously been reported. The outcomes of the open-label period (week 16 to week 48) are reported here. At 48 weeks, efficacy (including mean haemoglobin concentration and quality of life measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Fatigue scale) was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed per protocol. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03500549, and has been completed.

Findings

Between June 14, 2018, and Nov 14, 2019, 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with pegcetacoplan (41 patients) or eculizumab (39 patients). Most participants were women (49 [61%]) and 31 (39%) were men; 12 (15%) were Asian, two (3%) were Black, 49 (61%) were White, and 17 (21%) were another race or did not report their race. The open-label period had 77 participants (38 pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan, 39 eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan). Patients in the pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan group maintained high mean haemoglobin concentrations between 16 weeks (11·54 g/dL [SD 1·96]) and 48 weeks (11·30 g/dL [1·77]; p=0·14). Patients in the eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan group had significantly greater mean haemoglobin concentrations at 48 weeks (11·57 g/dL [2·21]) versus 16 weeks (8·58 g/dL [0·96]; p<0·0001). Clinically meaningful improvements in FACIT-Fatigue scores were observed at 48 weeks, with a mean change from baseline for all patients receiving pegcetacoplan monotherapy of 9·89 points (SD 9·63), for patients in the pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan group mean 10·14 points (9·06), and for patients in the eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan group mean 9·62 points (10·34). During the entire study period, 13 (16%) of 80 patients discontinued treatment (three [7%] of 41 through to week 16 due to breakthrough haemolysis, and ten [13%] of 77 due to severe treatment-emergent adverse events) and 18 patients (eight pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan, ten eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan) had at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event during the open-label period, four were considered to be related to pegcetacoplan treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (in ≥10% patients) among both pegcetacoplan-treated groups during the open-label period were injection site reactions (in 20 [26%] of 77 patients), haemolysis (15 [19%]), nasopharyngitis (12 [16%]), and diarrhoea (ten [13%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred throughout the duration of the study.

Interpretation

The durability of improved haematological outcomes and favourable safety profile over 48 weeks of treatment suggests that pegcetacoplan has the potential to improve treatment benefit and alter treatment goals in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria.

Funding

Apellis Pharmaceuticals.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
上官若男应助puzhongjiMiQ采纳,获得10
刚刚
yeahyeahhh完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Orange应助乱世才子采纳,获得10
1秒前
阿发发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
shdheud完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Zhen_Huang应助川上富江采纳,获得10
2秒前
Rachel发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
zyw完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
wyd222完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
知性的猎豹完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
孤独雨梅完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
悠南完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
波菌发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
范范范完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
maomao完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小小aa16完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
QQ发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
mdJdm完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
NPUerLin完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
JL完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
海晏河清发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
温暖烨霖完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
风中的嘉熙完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
EXPHC完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
劈里啪啦完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
无情白羊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
PGONE完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
安安完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Liuiiii完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
12秒前
科研通AI6.1应助麦种采纳,获得10
12秒前
ddd发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
EXPHC发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
CCRN 的官方教材 《AACN Core Curriculum for High Acuity, Progressive, and Critical Care Nursing》第8版 1000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5967704
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7261800
关于积分的说明 15978224
捐赠科研通 5104950
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2741876
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1706404
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1620664