Persistent Tissue-Level Hypoperfusion (No-Reflow) Negates the Clinical Benefit of Successful Thrombectomy

BACKGROUND: Tissue-level hypoperfusion (no-reflow) persists in 30% of patients with seemingly successful upstream angiographic recanalization at thrombectomy. We investigated the clinical impact of the no-reflow phenomenon by comparing patients with no-reflow versus patients with varying degrees of angiographic recanalization. METHODS: In a post hoc pooled analysis of the EXTEND-IA (Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke With Perfusion-Imaging Selection) and EXTEND-IA TNK (Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke) part 1 and 2 trials, clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between patients with (1) full angiographic recanalization with no-reflow (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] 2c3-NoReflow), defined as >15% reduction in relative cerebral blood flow or Volume within the infarct relative to a contralateral homolog on 24-hour-follow-up perfusion computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging despite eTICI grade 2c-3 angiographic recanalization, (2) full angiographic recanalization and tissue reperfusion (eTICI 2c3-CompleteFlow), (3) partial angiographic recanalization (eTICI 2b), and (4) unsuccessful thrombectomy (eTICI 0-2a). The primary outcome, functional independence at 90 days, was investigated using a mixed effect logistic regression model, both unadjusted and adjusted for a priori-selected covariates, namely age, premorbid modified Rankin Scale, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and baseline core volume. RESULTS: =0.04). CONCLUSIONS: When no-reflow occurred, clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with full angiographic recanalization were similar to patients with unsuccessful thrombectomy. Preventing or reversing no-reflow has the potential to augment the clinical benefit of reperfusion treatment in ischemic stroke.