医学
化疗所致周围神经病变
最小临床重要差异
周围神经病变
化疗
内科学
神经毒性
癌症
妇科肿瘤学
生活质量(医疗保健)
肿瘤科
物理疗法
随机对照试验
毒性
糖尿病
护理部
内分泌学
作者
Fiona Yeo,Chiu Chin Ng,Kiley Wei-Jen Loh,Alex Molassiotis,Huilin Cheng,Joseph S. K. Au,Kwun To Leung,Yu Chung Li,Kam-Hung Wong,Lorna Kwai Ping Suen,Choi Wan Chan,Janelle Yorke,Carole Farrell,Aishwarya Bandla,Emily Ang,Violeta López,Raghav Sundar,Alexandre Chan
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00520-019-04771-8
摘要
This is the first study to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), a validated instrument designed to elicit cancer patients’ experience of symptoms and functional limitations related to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Cancer patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy completed EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity [FACT/GOG-NTX] at baseline, second cycle of chemotherapy (T2, n = 287), and 12 months after chemotherapy (T3, n = 191). Anchor-based approach used the validated FACT/GOG-NTX neurotoxicity (Ntx) subscale to identify optimal MCID cutoff for deterioration. Distribution-based approach used one-third standard deviation (SD), half SD, and one standard error of measurement of the total EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 score. There was a moderate correlation between the change scores of the Ntx subscale and sensory and motor subscales of QLQ-CIPN20 (T2: r = − 0.722, p < 0.001 and r = − 0.518, p < 0.001, respectively; T3: r = − 0.699; p < 0.001 and r = − 0.523, p < 0.001, respectively). The correlation between the change scores of the Ntx subscale and the QLQ-CIPN20 autonomic subscale was poor (T2: r = − 0.354, p < 0.001; T3: r = 0.286, p < 0.001). Based on the MCID derived using distribution-based method, the MCID for the QLQ-CIPN20 sensory subscale was 2.5–5.9 (6.9% to 16.4% of the subdomain score) and for motor subscale was 2.6–5.0 (8.1%–15.6% of the subdomain score). The MCID for the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 established using distribution-based approaches was 2.5–5.9 for the sensory subscale and 2.6–5.0 for the motor subscale. When noted in assessments even with small change in scores, clinicians can be alerted for appropriate intervention.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI