A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of well-being-focused interventions

心理干预 漏斗图 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 医学 出版偏见 置信区间 斯科普斯 人口 系统回顾 梅德林 可信区间 临床心理学 物理疗法 心理学 循证医学 严格标准化平均差 干预(咨询) 老年学 临床试验 混淆 外部有效性 研究设计 相对风险 稳健性(进化) 选择偏差 比较有效性研究 循证实践 流行病学 经验证据
作者
Lowri Wilkie,Zoe Fisher,Antonia Geidel,Isabel Goodall,Shannon Kamil,Elen Davies,Andrew H. Kemp
出处
期刊:Nature Human Behaviour [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:10 (4): 715-726 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41562-025-02369-1
摘要

Improving population well-being is increasingly recognized as a global priority, yet evidence on the comparative effectiveness of well-being-focused interventions in adults is fragmented. Here we conduct a preregistered systematic review and network meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023403480) of randomized controlled trials evaluating well-being interventions in adults without diagnosed conditions. Searches of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and Scopus (to March 2023) identified 183 trials (n = 22,811). Interventions included mindfulness-based, compassion-based, acceptance and commitment therapy and positive psychology interventions, as well as exercise, yoga, educational, nature-based programmes and combined exercise-psychological approaches. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and data were synthesized using random-effects network meta-analysis. Most interventions improved well-being compared with inactive controls. Combined exercise-psychological interventions produced the largest effect (standardized mean difference of 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 1.20). Mindfulness, compassion, single positive psychology, yoga and exercise interventions demonstrated moderate, consistent effects (standardized mean difference of 0.41-0.49), with no significant differences between interventions. Nature-based interventions were not significantly more effective than controls, but evidence was limited by conceptual and methodological heterogeneity. Risk of bias was frequently moderate to high, and funnel plot asymmetry suggested potential publication bias. However, multiple sensitivity analyses (including grey literature, excluding studies with high risk of bias and small studies) supported the robustness of overall conclusions. Most comparisons (71%) were rated as moderate in certainty of evidence using CINEMA. These findings provide an integrated synthesis of the well-being intervention literature and highlight priority areas for future interdisciplinary, methodologically robust research. No external funding was received.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Akim的应助被SYX采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
小乌龟发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Xzmmmm完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
学医的小陈完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
ylyyyy完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
向前发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
何88888888完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
晨钟发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被yx采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
小左完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
qiyirng发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
无花果的应助被大力采纳,获得10
11秒前
wu发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
54不得了发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Jason发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
李健的小迷弟的应助被HuiLang采纳,获得30
15秒前
大方的契完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
Jasper的应助被wu采纳,获得10
16秒前
muyongxin完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
大方的契发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
牧青发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
10086完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
魔真人发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
自動車の空力技術 800
Biographisches Lexikon der hervorragenden Ärzte der letzten fünfzig Jahre [1880–1930]. Zugleich Fortsetzung des Biographischen Lexikons der hervorragenden Ärzte aller Zeiten und Völker 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Issues in Task-Based Language Teaching 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7786949
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9325475
关于积分的说明 20405534
捐赠科研通 7375877
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3321877
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2469808
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2338564