医学
安慰剂
危险系数
阿比曲酮
临床终点
醋酸阿比特龙酯
内科学
前列腺癌
肿瘤科
中期分析
析因分析
置信区间
比例危险模型
无进展生存期
泌尿科
生存分析
前列腺
总体生存率
事后
对数秩检验
临床试验
倾向得分匹配
作者
Karim S. Fizazi,N.W. Clarke,Maria De Santis,H. Uemura,A.P. Fay,N. Karadurmus,C. Alvarez-Fernandez,S. Jiang,Dominique Siobhan Parslow,Miguel Jhonatan Sotelo,Y. Ürün,Niara Oliveira,T. Gyun Kwon,Mustafa Özgüroğlu,G. Roubaud,Daniel Castellano,Jill K. Logan,T. Morris,Christopher Gresty,D.J. George
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.annonc.2026.10.097
摘要
Background Patients with phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-deficient de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) have poor prognosis and reduced benefit from current standard of care. The phase III CAPItello-281 study (NCT04493853) showed a statistically significant benefit in radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) with capivasertib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone (combined with prednisone/prednisolone and androgen deprivation therapy): hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.98; P =0.034. The HR for interim overall survival (OS; 26% maturity) was 0.90, 95% CI 0.71-1.15. Here, we report ad hoc, descriptive analyses at 42% OS data maturity. Patients and methods Patients with de novo mHSPC and PTEN-deficient tumors (defined as ≥90% of viable malignant cells with no specific cytoplasmic staining by immunohistochemistry) received capivasertib plus abiraterone or matched placebo (randomized 1:1) plus abiraterone. Analyses performed at this ad hoc data cut-off, including the alpha-controlled key secondary endpoint of OS as well as the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed rPFS, were descriptive and not prespecified in the protocol. Results 1012 patients received capivasertib plus abiraterone ( n =507) or placebo plus abiraterone ( n =505). At this ad hoc analysis at 42% OS maturity (data cut-off: March 9, 2026), with 17 months' additional follow-up (median follow-up 39 months in both arms), HR for OS favored capivasertib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P =0.044) and OS medians were reached: 57.4 versus 46.5 months. Updated rPFS (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, nominal P =0.033; median 35.5 versus 26.0 months) was consistent with the primary analysis. The safety profile remained consistent with the primary findings. Conclusions With longer follow-up, findings from this updated descriptive analysis support the clinically meaningful OS benefit of adding capivasertib to abiraterone in the treatment of patients with PTEN-deficient mHSPC. Capivasertib plus abiraterone represents a first-in-class targeted treatment approach for this poor prognosis population with high unmet need.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI