安慰剂
偏头痛
药方
随机对照试验
评定量表
物理疗法
心理学
医学
非语言交际
临床心理学
安慰剂组
显著性差异
精神科
临床试验
治疗组和对照组
考试(生物学)
麻醉
内科学
随机化
言语记忆
作者
Sara Romanazzo,Francesca Monti,Sara Ceccatelli,Francesco De Cesaris,Alberto Chiarugi,Fiammetta Cosci
摘要
Introduction: Verbal instructions modulate the expectation concerning a given drug. Knowing that the prescribing clinician is positive and enthusiastic toward the prescribed treatment may lead to positive expectations. We tested whether administering strongly positive verbal instructions together with a pharmacological prescription might trigger a placebo effect in migraine patients. Methods: Outpatients (n = 102) were randomly assigned to: (a) an experimental condition: the pharmacological prescription was coupled to strongly positive verbal instructions; (b) a control condition: the prescription was coupled to positive verbal instructions. Subjects were assessed before the prescription (T0), 7-day (T1), 15-day (T2), 1-month (T3), 2-month (T4), and 3-month after it (T5). At each assessment point, Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and two Numeric Rating Scales (NRSs) were proposed. Kellner’s scale of change was administered at T1-T5. Results: Patients who received strongly positive instructions had no HIT decrease (p = 0.177; η2 = 0.034). Patients who received positive instructions had HIT decrease (p = 0.006; η2 = 0.770). No difference was found between the groups. No significant across timepoints change of expectations was observed in the group who received strongly positive instructions (p = 0.433; η2 = 0.021) or in the group who received positive instructions (p = 0.151; η2 = 0.037). Since the first group had a decrease across timepoints of the score while the second group had a peak at T2, difference between them was statistically significant (p = 0.029; η2 = 0.049). Conclusion: Strongly positive verbal instructions did not produce placebo effect.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI