Breast Cancer Detection with Standalone AI versus Radiologist Interpretation of Unilateral Surveillance Mammography after Mastectomy

医学 乳腺摄影术 乳腺癌 乳房切除术 放射科 癌症 癌症检测 内科学
作者
Su Min Ha,Janie M. Lee,Myoung‐jin Jang,Hong Kyu Kim,Jung Min Chang
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:315 (1): e242955-e242955 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.242955
摘要

Background Limited data are available regarding the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms trained on bilateral mammograms for second breast cancer surveillance in patients with a personal history of breast cancer treated with unilateral mastectomy. Purpose To compare the performance of standalone AI for second breast cancer surveillance on unilateral mammograms with that of radiologists reading mammograms without AI assistance. Materials and Methods In this retrospective institutional database study, patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2001 and December 2018 and underwent postmastectomy surveillance mammography from January 2011 to March 2023 were included. Radiologists' mammogram interpretations without AI assistance were collected from these records and compared with AI interpretations of the same mammograms. The reference standards were histologic examination and 1-year follow-up data. The cancer detection rate per 1000 screening examinations, sensitivity, and specificity of standalone AI and the radiologists' interpretations without AI were compared using the McNemar test. Results Among the 4184 asymptomatic female patients (mean age, 52 years), 111 (2.7%) had contralateral second breast cancer. The cancer detection rate (17.4 per 1000 examinations [73 of 4184]; 95% CI: 13.7, 21.9) and sensitivity (65.8% [73 of 111]; 95% CI: 56.2, 74.5) were greater for standalone AI than for radiologists (14.6 per 1000 examinations [61 of 4184]; 95% CI: 11.2, 18.7; P = .01; 55.0% [61 of 111]; 95% CI: 45.2, 64.4; P = .01). The specificity was lower for standalone AI than for radiologists (91.5% [3725 of 4073]; 95% CI: 90.6, 92.3 vs 98.1% [3996 of 4073]; 95% CI: 97.6, 98.5; P < .001). AI detected 16 of 50 (32%) cancers missed by radiologists; however, 34 of 111 (30.6%) breast cancers were missed by both radiologists and AI. Conclusion Standalone AI for surveillance mammography showed higher sensitivity with lower specificity for contralateral breast cancer detection in patients treated with unilateral mastectomy than radiologists without AI assistance. © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Philpotts in this issue.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
衷燊完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
chen完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
王正芳完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
愀萱完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
衷燊发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
失眠可愁发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Yu完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
镜中永恒发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
mark完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
我是老大应助哈基米采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
张先生发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Akim应助白日梦想家采纳,获得10
11秒前
柒柒完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
七叶花开发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
学术皇宠完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
草莓雪酪发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
纯纯么么哒完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
Ccc发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
欸巧克力豆完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Shamare发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
拖鞋发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Liskiat2021发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
阿巴巴巴吧完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Effects of Two Weeks of Red Light Therapy on Choroidal Thickness and Axial Length in Young Adults 700
内視鏡的に摘除しえた十二指腸乳頭部腫瘍の2例 660
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The Neuroscience of Language 400
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7675992
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9242057
关于积分的说明 19915306
捐赠科研通 7246211
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3286295
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2444396
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2289105