医学
鼻腔给药
荟萃分析
不利影响
随机对照试验
丙酸氟替卡松
免疫学
哮喘
内科学
作者
Bernardo Sousa‐Pinto,Rafael José Vieira,Antonio Bognanni,Sara Gil‐Mata,Renato Ferreira‐da‐Silva,André Ferreira,António Cardoso‐Fernandes,Henrique Ferreira‐Cardoso,Manuel Marques‐Cruz,Vítor Duarte,João Castro‐Teles,Miguel Lopes,Ana Teixeira‐Ferreira,Nuno Lourenço‐Silva,Iván Chérrez-Ojeda,Anna Bedbrook,Ludger Klimek,Juan José Yepes-Núñez,Torsten Zuberbier,João Fonseca
出处
期刊:Allergy
[Wiley]
日期:2024-11-16
卷期号:80 (1): 94-105
被引量:16
摘要
Intranasal medications for AR display clinically relevant differences in their efficacy, but all show a good safety profile. To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis comparing INAH, INCS, and INAH+INCS in AR, providing relevant evidence for guideline developers and practising physicians on the most efficacious treatments.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI