Evaluating ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2 in Answering and Explaining Conceptual Medical Physiology Multiple-Choice Questions

集合(抽象数据类型) 理解力 多项选择 人工智能 过程(计算) 计算机科学 考试(生物学) 医学 医学教育 显著性差异 内科学 操作系统 古生物学 生物 程序设计语言
作者
Mayank Agarwal,Ayan Goswami,Priyanka Sharma
出处
期刊:Cureus [Cureus, Inc.]
卷期号:15 (9): e46222-e46222 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.7759/cureus.46222
摘要

Background Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2 may assist in explaining complex medical science topics. A few studies have shown that AI can solve complicated physiology problems that require critical thinking and analysis. However, further studies are required to validate the effectiveness of AI in answering conceptual multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in human physiology. Objective This study aimed to evaluate and compare the proficiency of ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2 in answering and explaining a curated set of MCQs in medical physiology. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a set of 55 MCQs from 10 competencies of medical physiology was purposefully constructed that required comprehension, problem-solving, and analytical skills to solve them. The MCQs and a structured prompt for response generation were presented to ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2. The explanations provided by both AI systems were documented in an Excel spreadsheet. All three authors subjected these explanations to a rating process using a scale of 0 to 3. A rating of 0 was assigned to an incorrect, 1 to a partially correct, 2 to a correct explanation with some aspects missing, and 3 to a perfectly correct explanation. Both AI models were evaluated for their ability to choose the correct answer (option) and provide clear and comprehensive explanations of the MCQs. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare AI responses. The Fleiss multi-rater kappa (κ) was used to determine the score agreement among the three raters. The statistical significance level was decided at P ≤ 0.05. Results Claude-2 answered 40 MCQs correctly, which was significantly higher than the 26 correct responses from ChatGPT-3.5. The rating distribution for the explanations generated by Claude-2 was significantly higher than that of ChatGPT-3.5. The κ values were 0.804 and 0.818 for Claude-2 and ChatGPT-3.5, respectively. Conclusion In terms of answering and elucidating conceptual MCQs in medical physiology, Claude-2 surpassed ChatGPT-3.5. However, accessing Claude-2 from India requires the use of a virtual private network, which may raise security concerns.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
FashionBoy应助τ涛采纳,获得10
1秒前
yuki完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
终醒完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
吃瓜少女发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
汉堡包应助柔弱的时光采纳,获得10
6秒前
我是老大应助田田田采纳,获得10
6秒前
lidan_2008发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
axt发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
心灵美的修洁完成签到 ,获得积分0
9秒前
9秒前
ZLY发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
阿里山完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
倾听完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
Sue完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
zbm完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小菜狗发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
喜悦兰完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
xmy发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
壮观的垣完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
τ涛发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Hello应助坚定凝安采纳,获得10
14秒前
jijun完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
wcy完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
田様应助HJJHJH采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
机智如霜发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
123456完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
Real World Research, 5th Edition 680
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 660
Superabsorbent Polymers 600
Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Security in Asia 555
Between high and low : a chronology of the early Hellenistic period 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5672675
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4927639
关于积分的说明 15141537
捐赠科研通 4831856
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2587684
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1541491
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1499721