Evaluating ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2 in Answering and Explaining Conceptual Medical Physiology Multiple-Choice Questions

集合(抽象数据类型) 理解力 多项选择 人工智能 过程(计算) 计算机科学 考试(生物学) 医学 医学教育 显著性差异 内科学 操作系统 古生物学 生物 程序设计语言
作者
Mayank Agarwal,Ayan Goswami,Priyanka Sharma
出处
期刊:Cureus [Cureus, Inc.]
卷期号:15 (9): e46222-e46222 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.7759/cureus.46222
摘要

Background Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2 may assist in explaining complex medical science topics. A few studies have shown that AI can solve complicated physiology problems that require critical thinking and analysis. However, further studies are required to validate the effectiveness of AI in answering conceptual multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in human physiology. Objective This study aimed to evaluate and compare the proficiency of ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2 in answering and explaining a curated set of MCQs in medical physiology. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a set of 55 MCQs from 10 competencies of medical physiology was purposefully constructed that required comprehension, problem-solving, and analytical skills to solve them. The MCQs and a structured prompt for response generation were presented to ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2. The explanations provided by both AI systems were documented in an Excel spreadsheet. All three authors subjected these explanations to a rating process using a scale of 0 to 3. A rating of 0 was assigned to an incorrect, 1 to a partially correct, 2 to a correct explanation with some aspects missing, and 3 to a perfectly correct explanation. Both AI models were evaluated for their ability to choose the correct answer (option) and provide clear and comprehensive explanations of the MCQs. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare AI responses. The Fleiss multi-rater kappa (κ) was used to determine the score agreement among the three raters. The statistical significance level was decided at P ≤ 0.05. Results Claude-2 answered 40 MCQs correctly, which was significantly higher than the 26 correct responses from ChatGPT-3.5. The rating distribution for the explanations generated by Claude-2 was significantly higher than that of ChatGPT-3.5. The κ values were 0.804 and 0.818 for Claude-2 and ChatGPT-3.5, respectively. Conclusion In terms of answering and elucidating conceptual MCQs in medical physiology, Claude-2 surpassed ChatGPT-3.5. However, accessing Claude-2 from India requires the use of a virtual private network, which may raise security concerns.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
怂怂的哈哈怪完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
wushangyu发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
星星完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Criminology34应助lucygaga采纳,获得10
2秒前
More应助清逸之风采纳,获得10
2秒前
4秒前
华仔应助ybk666采纳,获得10
5秒前
初景发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
大个应助wushangyu采纳,获得10
6秒前
9秒前
10秒前
zzzzzzz发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
复成完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
唐tang完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
科研通AI6.4应助超子采纳,获得10
13秒前
西山菩提发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
HUI发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
17发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Semy应助白鹭思一骋采纳,获得50
17秒前
ZJ完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
星辰大海应助临风采纳,获得30
20秒前
21秒前
Criminology34应助lucygaga采纳,获得10
21秒前
酶烦劳完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
蛋蛋发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
sube完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
yun完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
wushangyu发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
MMM完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
sube发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
852应助li采纳,获得10
29秒前
31秒前
wenjian完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
临风完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
34秒前
yoyo完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
完美世界应助wushangyu采纳,获得10
37秒前
Xide完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
高分求助中
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
A Handbook of User Experience Research & Design in Libraries 400
Understanding Modeling and Simulation of Polymerization Reactions 400
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 400
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6904466
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8598240
关于积分的说明 18252912
捐赠科研通 6307120
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3063569
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2085990
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2041366