Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists: Lessons learned from clinical trials and future directions

Platelets play an important role in the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and ischemic stroke. The expression of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (αIIb/β3 integrin) receptor on the surface of activated platelets constitutes the common pathway for platelet aggregation. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa has low affinity for its soluble ligands (fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor) in resting platelets. In the setting of vascular injury, platelet activation occurs after binding of the glycoprotein Ib-IX-V receptor to von Willebrand factor in the extracellular matrix (at high shear rate) and binding of soluble agonists to specific platelet membrane receptors. The ensuing inside-out signaling increases several-fold the affinity and avidity of αIIb/β3 for its ligands. High affinity ligand binding to αIIb/β3 triggers outside-in signaling, causing microskeletal contraction and platelet retraction. The signaling pathways for inside-out and outside-in signaling are incompletely understood. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists were developed under the premise that these agents would abrogate platelet aggregation while preserving platelet monolayer deposition at sites of injury. A number of parenteral and oral agents have been developed and evaluated in clinical trials. Three of them are approved in the United States and other countries: abciximab (ReoPro; the Fab fragment of a chimeric human-mouse antibody), eptifibatide (Integrelin; a cyclic heptapeptide), and tirofiban (Aggrastat; a tyrosine-derived nonpeptide molecule). The greatest clinical impact of these parenteral agents (used in conjunction with aspirin and heparin) has been in the prevention of ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. In contrast, oral agents have yielded disappointing results in the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes, and none of them are approved at present. Eptifibatide and tirofiban are specific for αIIb/β3, whereas abciximab also exhibits cross-reactivity with the αvβ3 and αMβ2 integrins. Although αIIb/β3 is unique to platelets and megakaryocytes, αvβ3 is more widely distributed and mediates several functions, including endothelial cell migration, monocyte adhesion, angiogenesis, and inhibition of apoptosis. αMβ2 mediates leukocyte-platelet interactions. In the percutaneous coronary intervention trials, abciximab has been more efficacious than the other parenteral agents, perhaps because of cross-reactivity with these other integrins, the pharmacodynamic profile of abciximab, or other effects. Other documented effects of abciximab include acute dethrombosis, reduction of thrombin generation, and improved flow in the coronary microcirculation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Abciximab is presently under evaluation in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Promising data have been obtained in experimental models of tumor angiogenesis and sickle cell anemia.