Detection of Fungal Infections Using Radiolabeled Antifungal Agents

The outcome of antifungal therapy depends on the progression of the infection at the start of therapy. Unfortunately, most patients are diagnosed once the fungal infection has progressed considerably as a result of the non-specific clinical signs of fungal infections in immunocompromised patients and the poor sensitivity of current mycological diagnostic tests. This review will highlight current fungal diagnostic techniques and will focus on scintigraphic methods for the specific detection of fungal infections in mice. For this purpose, antifungal components (e.g. fluconazole and antifungal peptides) are radiolabeled e.g. with technetium-99m ((99m)Tc) and their in vivo distribution is monitored in infected mice. It has been demonstrated that (99m)Tc-fluconazole is an excellent tracer to detect Candida albicans infections in mice as it distinguishes these infections from bacterial infections and sterile inflammations. However, this radiopharmaceutical only poorly detects infections with Aspergillus fumigatus in mice. (99m)Tc-peptides derived from antifungal peptides/proteins, such as human ubiquicidin and lactoferrin, can distinguish C. albicans and A. fumigatus infections from sterile inflammations, but not from bacterial infections, in mice. Furthermore, the efficacy of fluconazole in C. albicans-infected mice could be successfully monitored using (99m)Tc-ubiquicidin. In conclusion, neither (99m)Tc-fluconazole nor the (99m)Tc-peptides tested are optimal tracers for fungal infections. Nonetheless, since early initiation of antifungal therapy for candidemia reduces its high mortality rate, a positive result with (99m)Tc-fluconazole scintigraphy is of clinical relevance. Finally, the possibility that other (radiolabeled) antifungal agents, e.g. voriconazole, caspofungin, antifungal plant or insect defensins, can be useful for detection of fungal infections should be considered.