Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review

医学 腹腔镜检查 腹膜液 普通外科 内科学
作者
Karol Rawicz‐Pruszyński,Maria Erodotou,Zuzanna Pelc,Katarzyna Sędłąk,Wojciech Polkowski,Timothy M. Pawlik,Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
出处
期刊:International Journal of Surgery [Wolters Kluwer]
卷期号:109 (11): 3578-3589 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1097/js9.0000000000000632
摘要

Background: Staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer is recommended to assess the tumor’s locoregional extension and exclude peritoneal disease. As there is no consensus on optimizing the procedure’s diagnostic accuracy, we aimed to systematically review the literature on operative techniques, followed by peritoneal lavage fluid assessment in gastric cancer patients. Specifically, we sought to indicate the most common characteristics of the procedure and cytological evaluation. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD: 42022306746). On September 2022, a search was carried out using Embase, Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Results: The search identified 1632 studies on staging laparoscopy and 2190 studies on peritoneal fluid assessment. Some 212 studies were included. Open Hasson was the method of choice in accessing the peritoneal cavity in 65% of the studies, followed by establishing a pneumoperitoneum at 10–12 mmHg in 52% of reports. Most frequently, the patient was positioned supine (70%), while a 30° scope and three ports were used to assess the peritoneal cavity clockwise (72%, 77%, and 85%, respectively). Right and left upper abdomen quadrants were the predominant area of laparoscopic exploration (both 65%), followed by the primary tumor region (54%), liver and pelvis (both 30%), and small bowel and spleen (19% and 17%, respectively). Regions of peritoneal lavage and aspiration were limited to the pelvis (50%), followed by right and left upper abdomen quadrants (37.5% and 50%, respectively). No studies compared different methods of operative techniques or analysis of ascites/fluid. Conclusions: This study indicates a high heterogeneity in the technique of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer patients. Further research and initiatives to reach a consensus on the standardization of the procedure are warranted.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
乐乐的应助被王小花采纳,获得10
1秒前
得意黑发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
天天快乐的应助被HJJHJH采纳,获得10
1秒前
7秒前
7秒前
冷静的尔白完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
coozrasimon发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
1255475177完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
科目三的应助被平常的汉堡采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
newenewbro完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
孙w完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
南风不竞发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
美好曼寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
min发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
张振国完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
wanci的应助被得意黑采纳,获得10
15秒前
17秒前
希望天下0贩的0的应助被虎海采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
南风不竞完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
脆骨发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
KK发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
可爱的函函的应助被min采纳,获得10
26秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被zll采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
yp777的应助被自由的网络采纳,获得10
27秒前
刘小猪主人完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
喜悦的绮露完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
传奇3的应助被Lp笨小孩采纳,获得10
28秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被ZZZ采纳,获得10
29秒前
31秒前
大晗完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
画画完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
王小磊完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
现代冰绿给现代冰绿的求助进行了留言
37秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
CLSI C56QG Examples of Hemolyzed, Icteric, and Lipemic/Turbid Samples Quick Guide 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7815352
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9344938
关于积分的说明 20526711
捐赠科研通 7408157
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3330903
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2477377
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2350558