The external/internal sources and sinks of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O) in the Pearl River Estuary and adjacent coastal waters in summer

Estuary acts as a hotspot of greenhouse gases (GHGs, including CO2, CH4 and N2O) to the atmosphere. However, the GHGs budgets, including input/output fluxes through interfaces and biogeochemical source/sink processes in water columns, of the estuarine systems are still not well constrained due to the lacking of comprehensive observational data. Here, we presented the spatial distributions of GHGs of surface/bottom water and sediment porewater along the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) and adjacent region during summertime. The incorporation of the monitoring for the sediment-water interface (SWI) with these of the water-air interface (WAI) allows us to close the budget revealing additional information of internal consumption/production processes of the three GHGs. The oversaturated CO2 (481–7573 μatm), CH4 (289–16,990 %) and N2O (108–649 %) in surface water suggested PRE is a significant GHGs source to the atmosphere, in which CO2 is the major contributor accounting for 90 % of total global warming potential (GWP), leaving 2.8 % from CH4, and 7.2 % from N2O. Addition to the river input, the SWI releases GHGs to the overlying water with fluxes of 3.5 × 107, 10.8 × 104 and 0.7 × 104 mol d−1 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Although all three GHGs exhibited emission to the atmosphere, our mass balance calculation showed that 16.9× 107 mol d−1 of CO2 and 1.0 × 104 mol d−1 of N2O were consumed, respectively, inside the estuary water body, while extra-production (13.8 × 104 mol d−1) of CH4 was demanded in the water body to support its output flux. This is the first experiment quantitatively assessing the importance of internal carbon and nitrogen biogeochemical processes in the PRE. Our finding is of guiding significance to constrain the GHGs budget and draw up realistic pathways for modeling works of GHGs prediction.