医学
支持者
随机对照试验
呼吸内科
考试(生物学)
家庭医学
生活质量(医疗保健)
内科学
外科
护理部
历史
生物
古生物学
考古
作者
Nicolás Roche,Antonio Anzueto,Sinthia Bosnic‐Anticevich,Alan Kaplan,Marc Miravitlles,Dermot Ryan,Joan B. Soriano,Omar S. Usmani,Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos,Giorgio Walter Canonica
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal
[European Respiratory Society]
日期:2019-09-01
卷期号:54 (3): 1901511-1901511
被引量:71
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01511-2019
摘要
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are universally considered as the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of treatments. Their main strength is that, through randomisation, they avoid any major imbalance between compared groups: therefore, observed outcome differences between groups at the end of the trial are most likely related to treatment effects. Since they are inherently prospective by design, they also permit stability throughout the study to ensure that all conditions remain optimal to test the hypothesis of interest. These include high-quality follow-up, reinforced adherence, etc. Consequently, these studies can reach the highest level of internal validity, provided that all quality standards are followed, such as those defined by CONSORT guidelines.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI