同行反馈
第二语言写作
纠正性反馈
心理学
数学教育
教育学
计算机科学
第二语言
语言学
哲学
作者
Elif Demirel,Hüsnü ENGİNARLAR
标识
DOI:10.16986/huje.2016015701
摘要
This study attempts to test the effectiveness of a feedback model which combines teacher and peer feedback systematically on improving students' writing ability in the context of a multiple draft writing course.57 Turkish EFL students participated in the study which lasted for a 15-week semester.The experimental and control groups were provided different feedback treatments and then statistically compared in terms of the revisions they made in their essay drafts and their writing improvement.A total of 1197 essay drafts, were coded and compared for three types of revisions: content, organization and form.In order to collect data on students' attitudes towards writing and feedback, students were given a questionnaire and asked to write reflections about their writing process.Çalışmanın sonuçları göstermiştir ki, geleneksel öğretmen dönütü modeli genel anlamda daha fazla düzeltme yapılmasını sağlarken, iki farklı dönüt uygulaması düzeltme kalitesi ve yazma becerisi gelişmesinde istatistiksel açıdan farklı sonuçlar ortaya çıkarmamıştır.The results of the study revealed that while the traditional teacher feedback model created more revisions, the two different feedback models did not create statistically meaningful differences in terms of number of revisions and writing quality.However, the combined peer-teacher feedback model was found to be more successful in creating more positive attitudes towards peer feedback and self-revision.In terms of attitudes towards the difficulty of writing activity, on the other hand, important differences were not detected.Based on these results, suggestions have been made about the design and application of feedback activities in the writing class.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI