医学
普瑞巴林
加巴喷丁
工作组
体外
毒性
重症监护医学
麻醉
外科
内科学
病理
计算机网络
计算机科学
替代医学
作者
Josée Bouchard,Chris Yates,Diane P. Calello,Sophie Gosselin,Darren M. Roberts,Valéry Lavergne,Robert S. Hoffman,Marlies Ostermann,Ai Peng,Marc Ghannoum,Badria Alhatali,Kurt Anseeuw,Steven T. Bird,Ingrid Berling,Timothy E. Bunchman,Paul K. L. Chin,Kent Doi,Taís Freire Galvão,David S. Goldfarb,Hossein Hassanian
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.06.027
摘要
Toxicity from gabapentin and pregabalin overdose is commonly encountered. Treatment is supportive, and the use of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) is controversial. The EXTRIP workgroup conducted systematic reviews of the literature and summarized findings following published methods. Thirty-three articles (30 patient reports and 3 pharmacokinetic studies) met the inclusion criteria. High gabapentinoid extracorporeal clearance (>150mL/min) and short elimination half-life (<5 hours) were reported with hemodialysis. The workgroup assessed gabapentin and pregabalin as "dialyzable" for patients with decreased kidney function (quality of the evidence grade as A and B, respectively). Limited clinical data were available (24 patients with gabapentin toxicity and 7 with pregabalin toxicity received ECTR). Severe toxicity, mortality, and sequelae were rare in cases receiving ECTR and in historical controls receiving standard care alone. No clear clinical benefit from ECTR could be identified although major knowledge gaps were acknowledged, as well as costs and harms of ECTR. The EXTRIP workgroup suggests against performing ECTR in addition to standard care rather than standard care alone (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) for gabapentinoid poisoning in patients with normal kidney function. If decreased kidney function and coma requiring mechanical ventilation are present, the workgroup suggests performing ECTR in addition to standard care (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI