材料科学
钙钛矿(结构)
光致发光
卤化物
载流子
瞬态(计算机编程)
信号(编程语言)
光伏
电场
电压
光电子学
载流子寿命
分子物理学
计算物理学
光伏系统
化学物理
物理
化学
无机化学
结晶学
操作系统
生物
程序设计语言
量子力学
硅
计算机科学
生态学
作者
Lisa Krückemeier,Zhi‐Fa Liu,Benedikt Krogmeier,Uwe Rau,Thomas Kirchartz
标识
DOI:10.1002/aenm.202102290
摘要
Abstract Transient photoluminescence (TPL) and transient photovoltage (TPV) measurements are important and frequently applied methods to study recombination dynamics and charge‐carrier lifetimes in the field of halide‐perovskite photovoltaics. However, large‐signal TPL and small‐signal TPV decay times often correlate poorly and differ by orders of magnitude. In order to generate a quantitative understanding of the differences and similarities between the two methods, the impact of sample type (film vs device), large‐ versus small‐signal analysis, and differences in detection mode (voltage vs. luminescence) are explained using analytical and numerical models compared with experimental data. The main solution to achieving a consistent framework that describes both methods is the calculation of a voltage or carrier density dependent decay time that can be interpreted in terms of a capacitive region, a region dominated by defect‐assisted recombination and a region that is dominated by higher order recombination (radiative and Auger). It is experimentally shown that in the efficient methylammonium lead‐iodide solar cells, effective monomolecular lifetimes ≈2 µs can be consistently measured with TPL and TPV. Furthermore, the shape of the decay time versus voltage or carrier density follows predictions derived from implicit and explicit solutions to differential equations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI