Abaloparatide Improves Rotator Cuff Healing via Anabolic Effects on Bone Remodeling in a Chronic Rotator Cuff Tear Model of Rat With Osteoporosis: A Comparison With Denosumab

Background: Because of poor clinical outcomes, rotator cuff healing in patients with osteoporosis has recently gained attention. Antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis has been reported to improve healing after repair. However, the comparative effectiveness of anabolic and antiresorptive agents has not been investigated. Hypothesis: Anabolic therapy with abaloparatide (ABL) would outperform antiresorptive therapy with denosumab (Dmab) to improve rotator cuff healing in the osteoporotic status. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A chronic rotator cuff tear model was established in ovariectomy-induced postmenopausal osteoporotic rats. Then, bilateral rotator cuff repairs were conducted in all experimental rats, which were randomly divided into control (CON), Dmab, and ABL groups to receive the corresponding subcutaneous injections. The rats sacrificed at 2 weeks (the early healing period) were used to detect osteoblast and osteoclast activities, related gene expression (osteoclastogenesis, osteogenesis, and chondrogenesis), new bone formation, and mineralization. In the rats sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks, the bone mineral density and bone architecture at the repaired site were assessed by micro–computed tomography, and rotator cuff healing was evaluated using histological and biomechanical analyses. Results: At 8 weeks, significantly higher failure load and stiffness were observed in the ABL (25.13 ± 3.54 N, P < .001; 21.65 ± 3.08 N/mm, P < .001; respectively), and Dmab (21.21 ± 2.55 N, P < .001; 16.15 ± 2.07 N/mm, P = .008; respectively) groups than in the CON group (13.36 ± 1.70 N; 11.20 ± 2.59 N/mm; respectively), whereas the ABL treatment provided better failure load and stiffness than Dmab ( P = .019; P = .003). Although tendon-to-bone healing was improved by Dmab, the most mature tendon insertion at the interface was observed in the ABL group, including a more organized collagen and fibrocartilage and higher bone quality. ABL significantly promoted bone remodeling via coupling between osteoclasts and osteoblasts (osteoblast to osteoclast ratio: 4.80 ± 0.39; P = .022), thereby stimulating more new bone formation and mineralization at the tendon-to-bone healing interface than Dmab (osteoblast to osteoclast ratio: 3.21 ± 0.75) at 2 weeks. Moreover, ABL had significant effects on gene expression [Runt-realted transcription factor 2 ( Runx2, collagen type I-alpha 1 ( Col1A1]), and sclerostin for osteogenesis; aggrecan and collagen type II ( Col2) for chondrogenesis] in mineralized tissues, indicative of enhanced bone and fibrocartilage formation when compared with the CON and Dmab groups. Conclusion: ABL promoted rotator cuff healing in osteoporotic rats by significantly increasing the mineralized tissue quality and collagen maturity at the reattachment site, leading to improved biomechanical properties, and was superior to Dmab in both biomechanical and histological analyses. Clinical Relevance: Anabolic therapy with ABL may outperform antiresorptive therapy with Dmab in improving outcomes after rotator cuff repair in osteoporotic patients.