医学
管腔(解剖学)
血管内超声
气球
狭窄
再狭窄
光学相干层析成像
支架
病变
靶病变
血管成形术
放射科
核医学
外科
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
内科学
心肌梗塞
作者
Kirstine Nørregaard Hansen,Jens Trøan,Akiko Maehara,Manijeh Noori,Mikkel Hougaard,Julia Ellert‐Gregersen,Karsten Tange Veien,Anders Junker,Henrik Steen Hansen,Jens Flensted Lassen,Lisette Okkels Jensen
标识
DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.124.014665
摘要
BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome limitations related to late stent failures of drug-eluting stents, but lumen reductions over time after implantation of BRS have been reported. This study aimed to investigate if lesion preparation with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon minimizes lumen reduction after implantation of a Magmaris BRS assessed with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with stable angina were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to lesion preparation with a scoring balloon versus a standard noncompliant balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS. The primary end point was minimal lumen area at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Following Magmaris BRS implantation, minimal lumen area (6.4±1.6 versus 6.3±1.5 mm 2 ; P =0.65), mean scaffold area (7.8±1.5 versus 7.5±1.7 mm 2 ; P =0.37), and mean lumen area (8.0±1.6 versus 7.7±2.1 mm 2 ; P =0.41) did not differ significantly in patients with lesions prepared with scoring versus standard noncompliant balloon, respectively. Six-month angiographic follow-up with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound was available in 74 patients. The primary end point, 6-month minimal lumen area, was significantly larger in lesions prepared with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon (4.7±1.4 versus 3.9±1.9 mm 2 ; P =0.04), whereas mean lumen area (7.2±1.4 versus 6.8±2.2 mm 2 ; P =0.35) did not differ significantly. Intravascular ultrasound findings showed no difference in mean vessel area at the lesion site from baseline to follow-up in the scoring balloon group (16.8±2.9 versus 17.0±3.6 mm 2 ; P =0.62), whereas mean vessel area (17.1±4.4 versus 15.7±4.9 mm 2 ; P <0.001) was smaller in lesions prepared with a standard noncompliant balloon due to negative remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion preparation with a scoring balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS resulted in a significantly larger minimal lumen area after 6 months due to less negative remodeling compared with lesion preparation with a standard noncompliant balloon. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04666584.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI