Pectoral nerve blocks for breast surgery

医学 不利影响 麻醉 神经阻滞 荟萃分析 置信区间 随机对照试验 块(置换群论) 严格标准化平均差 外科 乳房外科 内科学 乳腺癌 几何学 数学 癌症
作者
Michael Meißner,Ece Austenfeld,Peter Kranke,Peter Zahn,Esther Pogatzki‐Zahn,Christine H. Meyer‐Frießem,Stephanie Weibel,Alexander Schnabel
出处
期刊:European Journal of Anaesthesiology [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:38 (4): 383-393 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1097/eja.0000000000001403
摘要

Pectoral nerve blocks (PECS block) might be an interesting new regional anaesthetic technique in patients undergoing breast surgery.The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate postoperative pain outcomes and adverse events of a PECS block compared with no treatment, sham treatment or other regional anaesthetic techniques in women undergoing breast surgery.We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) with meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment.The databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL (until December 2019) and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched.All RCTs investigating the efficacy and adverse events of PECS compared with sham treatment, no treatment or other regional anaesthetic techniques in women undergoing breast surgery with general anaesthesia were included.A total of 24 RCTs (1565 patients) were included. PECS (compared with no treatment) block might reduce pain at rest [mean difference -1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), -2.1 to -0.18, moderate quality evidence] but we are uncertain regarding the effect on pain during movement at 24 h after surgery (mean difference -1.79, 95% CI, -3.5 to -0.08, very low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain about the effect of PECS block on pain at rest at 24 h compared with sham block (mean difference -0.83, 95% CI, -1.80 to 0.14) or compared with paravertebral block (PVB) (mean difference -0.18, 95% CI, -1.0 to 0.65), both with very low-quality evidence. PECS block may have no effect on pain on movement at 24 h after surgery compared with PVB block (mean difference -0.56, 95% CI, -1.53 to 0.41, low-quality evidence). Block-related complications were generally poorly reported.There is moderate quality evidence that PECS block compared with no treatment reduces postoperative pain intensity at rest. The observed results were less pronounced if patients received a sham block. Furthermore, PECS blocks might be equally effective as PVBs. Due to mostly low-quality or very low-quality evidence level, further research is warranted.CRD42019126733.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
南乔完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
yangyang完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
钟是一梦完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
wanci应助Ll采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
孟柠柠发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
青阳完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研狗发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
jarenthar完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
丘比特应助hata采纳,获得10
6秒前
顾矜应助lszhw采纳,获得10
7秒前
lqq完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
共享精神应助拟拟采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
lhy12345完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
非常可爱发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
科研民工发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
文艺的初蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
TiAmo发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
刘十三完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
犹豫忆南完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
科研通AI5应助kingwhitewing采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
mm关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
xieyuanxing发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
左然然完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
人福药业完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527521
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107606
关于积分的说明 9286171
捐赠科研通 2805329
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539901
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716827
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709740