医学
急性呼吸窘迫
体外膜肺氧合
重症监护医学
多中心研究
体外
急性呼吸衰竭
梅德林
呼吸窘迫
全身炎症反应综合征
急性胸部综合征
肝素
急诊医学
疾病严重程度
呼吸衰竭
弥漫性肺泡损伤
急性呼吸窘迫综合征
临床试验
急性肾损伤
复苏
体外心肺复苏
危重病
作者
Ginga Suzuki,Kohei Ishikawa,Saria Nishioka,Toshimitsu Kobori,Yuka Masuyama,Saki Yamamoto,Hibiki Serizawa,Yoshimi Nakamichi,Mitsuru Honda,Japan Chest CT for acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (J-CARVE) Registry group
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0000000000007071
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether systemic anticoagulation therapy affects the survival of adult patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. SETTING: Twenty-four ICUs in Japan. PATIENTS: Six hundred and ninety-five patients received VV-ECMO for ARDS. Patients were divided into the anticoagulation group and the no-anticoagulation group according to whether or not they received anticoagulant therapy. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the propensity score-overlap-weighted analysis, there was no significant difference in the 28-day survival (85.8% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.50) between the two groups. The 60-day survival, ECMO duration, circuit exchanges, bleeding complications, and transfusion volumes were also comparable. The anticoagulation group had a significantly higher average activated partial thromboplastin time during ECMO (51.3 s vs. 39.3 s, p < 0.01). These findings remained consistent in the sensitivity analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic anticoagulation was not associated with short-term survival. Anticoagulation-free VV-ECMO may be feasible in patients at high-bleeding risk, but safety remains uncertain. Further studies should clarify optimal anticoagulation strategies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI