内容有效性
表面有效性
心理学
清晰
认知访谈
应用心理学
心理测量学
内容分析
认知
医学教育
测试有效性
适应(眼睛)
高等教育
社会心理学
项目反应理论
职业咨询
项目分析
结构效度
项目库
作业疗法
面子(社会学概念)
职业发展
人员选择
评定量表
考试(生物学)
预测效度
主题专家
同时有效性
过程(计算)
内容(测量理论)
标准效度
临床心理学
德雷福斯技能获得模型
项目评估
定性研究
作者
Karen M. Keptner,Rachel Rogers,Alyssa Chandler Lee,Daniel Martin
标识
DOI:10.1177/15394492261490096
摘要
University students face occupational disruption during post-secondary transitions, yet existing campus screening tools leave occupational challenges largely unassessed. No comprehensive, occupation-focused screening instrument exists for this population. To describe the theoretical development and content validation of the Occupations in Higher Education Transitions Inventory ( OHETI ), a screening tool assessing university student adaptation across 10 domains of occupation grounded in the Theory of Occupational Adaptation (OA) a five-phase iterative development process was used: (a) initial item generation; (b) preliminary expert review for face validity ( N = 3 occupational therapists with expertise in OA theory); (c) tool reconceptualization based on expert feedback; (d) cognitive interviews with undergraduate students for face validity and comprehensibility ( N = 10); and (e) formal content validation using a Content Validity Index (CVI) rating procedure with ( N = 6) occupational therapy professionals with clinical and academic experience with emerging adult students. Initial item generation yielded 68 items across seven OA constructs. Expert feedback prompted a fundamental restructuring, producing 116 items across 10 occupations, covering aspects of relative mastery: satisfaction, effectiveness, and efficiency. Revision based on student cognitive interviews resulted in 122 items. Formal content validation produced I-CVI scores ranging from 0.667 to 1.0, with S-CVI scores of 0.9516 for clarity and 0.9435 for relevance. Two items were removed, resulting in a final tool of 120 scorable items across 10 occupations. The OHETI demonstrates strong content and face validity as a theoretically grounded, occupation-focused screening tool for university students. Online administration and individualized feedback distinguish it from existing instruments. Psychometric validation is needed before broad implementation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI