医学
正电子发射断层摄影术
断层摄影术
放射科
肺孤立结节
核医学
对比度(视觉)
动态对比度
计算机断层摄影术
诊断准确性
磁共振成像
人工智能
计算机科学
作者
Fiona J. Gilbert,Scott Harris,Kenneth A. Miles,Jonathan Weir‐McCall,Nagmi R. Qureshi,Robert C. Rintoul,Sabina Dizdarevic,Lucy Pike,Donald A. R. Sinclair,Andrew Shah,Rosemary Eaton,Jeremy Jones,Andrew Clegg,Valerio Benedetto,James Hill,Andrew Cook,Dimitrios Tzelis,Luke Vale,Lucy Brindle,J. Madden
出处
期刊:Thorax
[BMJ]
日期:2021-12-09
卷期号:77 (10): 988-996
被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216948
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) have a high reported accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of these. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre trial, 380 participants with an SPN (8-30 mm) and no recent history of malignancy underwent DCE-CT and PET/CT. All patients underwent either biopsy with histological diagnosis or completed CT follow-up. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy for PET/CT and DCE-CT. Costs and cost-effectiveness were estimated from a healthcare provider perspective using a decision-model. RESULTS: 312 participants (47% female, 68.1±9.0 years) completed the study, with 61% rate of malignancy at 2 years. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values for DCE-CT were 95.3% (95% CI 91.3 to 97.5), 29.8% (95% CI 22.3 to 38.4), 68.2% (95% CI 62.4% to 73.5%) and 80.0% (95% CI 66.2 to 89.1), respectively, and for PET/CT were 79.1% (95% CI 72.7 to 84.2), 81.8% (95% CI 74.0 to 87.7), 87.3% (95% CI 81.5 to 91.5) and 71.2% (95% CI 63.2 to 78.1). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for DCE-CT and PET/CT was 0.62 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.67) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85), respectively (p<0.001). Combined results significantly increased diagnostic accuracy over PET/CT alone (AUROC=0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.93), p<0.001). DCE-CT was preferred when the willingness to pay per incremental cost per correctly treated malignancy was below £9000. Above £15 500 a combined approach was preferred. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT has a superior diagnostic accuracy to DCE-CT for the diagnosis of SPNs. Combining both techniques improves the diagnostic accuracy over either test alone and could be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02013063.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI