肺炎支原体
肺炎
医学
支原体肺炎
医学微生物学
内科学
效价
前瞻性队列研究
胃肠病学
聚合酶链反应
支原体
社区获得性肺炎
抗原
正谓词值
抗体
微生物学
免疫学
生物
预测值
基因
生物化学
作者
Naoyuki Miyashita,Yasuhiro Kawai,Takaaki Tanaka,Hiroto Akaike,Hideto Teranishi,Tokio Wakabayashi,Takashi Nakano,Kazunobu Ouchi,Niro Okimoto
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jiac.2015.02.007
摘要
A rapid antigen kit for the detection of the Mycoplasma pneumoniae ribosomal protein L7/L12 using an immunochromatographic assay, Ribotest Mycoplasma, became available in Japan in 2013. To determine the sensitivity of Ribotest compared with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we prospectively performed these two tests simultaneously in adolescent and adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In addition, we retrospectively analyzed the theoretical sensitivity of Ribotest using M. pneumoniae PCR-positive specimens from previous studies. In prospective study, 118 CAP cases were enrolled, and 16 cases were diagnosed as M. pneumoniae pneumonia; eight cases were PCR-positive, one case was culture positive, and all cases demonstrated a four-fold increase in antibody titer. Ribotest was positive in 15 cases; five cases were PCR positive and 10 cases were PCR negative. For the PCR was control test, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall agreement with Ribotest were 62.5%, 90.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. In the retrospective study, we used 1110 M. pneumoniae PCR-positive specimens, which are collected from pediatric patients with respiratory tract infection who visited 65 institutions throughout Japan. Using a cut-off level for the Ribotest of 8.3 × 10(4) copy/mL in transport medium, 667 (60.0%) specimens were theoretically positive. In conclusion, our prospective and retrospective results demonstrated that the diagnostic sensitivity of Ribotest compared with PCR was not high, at approximately 60%. Thus, treatment decisions about M. pneumoniae pneumonia should be based on clinical findings such as Japanese Respiratory Society scoring system and not on Ribotest results alone.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI