尽责
心理学
开放的体验
认知
社会心理学
认知心理学
情境伦理学
背景(考古学)
五大性格特征
认知需要
人格
外向与内向
生物
古生物学
神经科学
作者
Jeffery A. LePine,Jason A. Colquitt,Amir Erez
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x
摘要
We examined the extent to which cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience predict decision‐making performance prior to and after unforeseen changes in the task context. Seventy‐three undergraduates made decisions on a series of 75 problems during a 3‐hour computerized simulation. Unbeknownst to participants, the rules used in determining correct decisions changed after problems 25 and 50. Effects of the individual differences on decision‐making performance became significantly stronger after the changes. Only cognitive ability explained variance in prechange performance. Individuals with higher cognitive ability made better decisions. After the change, the cognitive ability effect increased and the effects of Conscientiousness and Openness became statistically significant. As expected, those with high Openness made better decisions. Unexpectedly, those with low Conscientiousness made better decisions. Subsequent analyses revealed that this surprising effect for Conscientiousness was due to the traits reflecting dependability (i.e., order, dutiful‐ness, deliberation) rather than volition (i.e., competence, achievement striving, self‐discipline).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI