医学
用词不当
干预(咨询)
主动脉夹层
人口
重症监护医学
外科
神学
环境卫生
精神科
哲学
主动脉
作者
Mohamad Bashir,Matti Jubouri,Sven Z. C. P. Tan,Damian M. Bailey,Bashi Velayudhan,Mohammed Idhrees,Randolph H.L. Wong,Martin Czerny,Edward P. Chen,Leonard N. Girardi,Joseph S. Coselli,Ian M. Williams
摘要
Abstract Background Acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a rare condition that can be divided into complicated (CoTBAD) and uncomplicated (UnCoTBAD) based on certain presenting clinical and radiological features, with UnCoTBAD constituting the majority of TBAD cases. The classification of TBAD directly affects the treatment pathway taken, however, there remains confusion as to exactly what differentiates complicated from uncomplicated TBAD. Aims The scope of this review is to delineate the literature defining the intervention parameters for UnCoTBAD. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE to collate and summarize all research evidence on intervention parameters and protocols for UnCoTBAD. Results A TBAD without evidence of malperfusion or rupture might be classified as uncomplicated but there remains a subgroup who might exhibit high‐risk features. Two clinical features representative of “high risk” are refractory pain and persistent hypertension. First‐line treatment for CoTBAD is TEVAR, and whilst this has also proven its safety and effectiveness in UnCoTBAD, it is still being managed conservatively. However, TBAD is a dynamic pathology and a significant proportion of UnCoTBADs can progress to become complicated, thus necessitating more complex intervention. While the “high‐risk” UnCoTBAD do benefit the most from TEVAR, yet, the defining parameters are still debatable as this benefit can be extended to a wider UnCoTBAD population. Conclusion Uncomplicated TBAD remains a misnomer as it is frequently representative of a complex ongoing disease process requiring very close monitoring in a critical care setting. A clear diagnostic pathway may improve decision making following a diagnosis of UnCoTBAD. Choice of treatment still predominantly depends on when an equilibrium might be reached where the risks of TEVAR outweigh the natural history of the dissection in both the short‐ and long‐term.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI