医学
临床终点
随机对照试验
外科
静脉曲张
大隐静脉
闭塞
不利影响
射频消融术
烧蚀
临床试验
导管
静脉
压力袜
多中心研究
多中心试验
结束语(心理学)
意向治疗分析
生活质量(医疗保健)
随机化
作者
Tao Shang,Yue-feng Zhu,Jinsong Jiang,Ju He,Jin Yang,Lu Tian,Xiaohui Wang,Yangyan He,Qianqian Zhu,Zi-heng Wu,D L Li,Hong-kun Zhang
出处
期刊:Phlebology
[SAGE Publishing]
日期:2026-02-24
卷期号:: 2683555261426651-2683555261426651
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1177/02683555261426651
摘要
Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been recommended as the first-line treatment with primary great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. A multicenter randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate the performance, efficacy, and safety of the new radiofrequency ablation system (AcoArt Cedar TM ) with ClosureFast TM RFA system (Medtronic). Methods Consecutive eligible patients with primary GSV incompetence were randomized 1:1 to treatment with AcoArt Cedar TM or ClosureFast TM at multiple sites. The primary endpoint was the total occlusion rate of GSV 6 months after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included device success, immediate technical success, performance evaluation of the devices, and the mean change of the Revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) scores from baseline to 6 months post-treatment. Safety endpoint was device-related adverse events (AEs). All adverse events were recorded in the study. Results A total of 188 eligible patients were randomly assigned to treatment with AcoArt Cedar TM or ClosureFast TM . All patients achieved 100% device and immediate technical success. The performance of the RFA catheter and generator was evaluated as excellent for both groups. The total GSV occlusion rates at 6 months were 97.78% (88/90) versus 98.86% (87/88) for AcoArt Cedar TM and ClosureFast TM , respectively ( p = 1.000). Changes in AVVQ and VCSS scores from baseline to 6 months after treatment were similar in the two groups: AVVQ ( p = 0.802) and VCSS ( p = 0.984). Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 9.6% (9/94) versus 7.5% (7/93) of patients, for AcoArt Cedar TM and ClosureFast TM , respectively ( p = 0.9928). No device-related AEs or SAEs were found. Conclusion The AcoArt Cedar TM is a device associated with non-inferior effectiveness and safety compared to ClosureFast TM , with similar complete occlusion rates in the GSV with a low incidence of AEs. Trial registry name ClinicalTrials.gov ; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04658901?term=NCT04658901&rank=1 ; registration number: NCT04658901.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI