医学
药代动力学
加药
药品
严重烧伤
血浆浓度
麻醉
治疗药物监测
药理学
临床药理学
重症监护医学
药效学
内科学
体表面积
曲线下面积
代谢清除率
毒性
外科
曲线下面积
急诊医学
烧伤
抗生素
血液取样
作者
Ronald G. Hall,Levi Hooper,Sharmila Dissanaike,JOHN A GRISWOLD,Raja Reddy Kallem,Indhumathy Subramaniyan,William C. Putnam,Manjunath P Pai
摘要
ABSTRACT Introduction Patients with burns are at an increased risk of multidrug‐resistant pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and may need specialized dosing regimens due to alterations in physiology due to their injuries. Methods Therefore, we conducted a single‐dose, open‐label, pharmacokinetic study of ceftolozane (2 g)/tazobactam (1 g) infused over 60 min in six patients with partial‐ or full‐thickness burns and central line access. Serial blood samples were obtained at the following time points: 0 (predose) and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h following the start of infusion for determination of plasma drug concentrations. Results Similar estimates of clearance (CL) were observed between the groups, and as a consequence the half‐life (T1/2) was longer in the six patients with burns in the current study compared to previous studies of healthy volunteers on average. Although these mean comparisons suggest similarity in exposure based on area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax), it is important to recognize that the interindividual variability is approximately 2‐ to 5‐fold higher in patients with burns compared to healthy volunteers. Conclusions We did not find sufficient deviations in the concentrations of ceftolozane/tazobactam to recommend an empiric dose adjustment for patients with burns. However, this finding is limited by our small sample size and lack of clinical outcome data. Therefore, we also provide a conditional recommendation to conduct therapeutic drug monitoring to adjust ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing or to switch to a continuous infusion approach in cases of a suboptimal clinical response.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI