鼻咽癌
医学
诱导化疗
四分位间距
内科学
入射(几何)
化疗
多元分析
回顾性队列研究
阶段(地层学)
生存分析
放化疗
单变量分析
肿瘤科
淋巴结
胃肠病学
放射治疗
古生物学
物理
光学
生物
作者
Yan He,Zhihao Zhao,Ying Wang,Jiamin Chai,Jialing He,Jingjing Wang,Ling He,Hui Guan,Zhigong Wei,Zheran Liu,Xiaoli Mu,Xingchen Peng
出处
期刊:Head & neck
[Wiley]
日期:2020-03-23
卷期号:42 (8): 2067-2076
被引量:25
摘要
Abstract Background Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy is one of the standards of care for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the optimal number of induction cycles is unclear. Here we compared survival data from patients treated with 2 to 4 cycles. Methods Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2009 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Six hundred and seventy three patients met eligibility criteria. After a median follow‐up of 53 months (interquartile range, 38‐74), there was no difference between 2 and 3 cycles in overall survival (88.14% vs 91.24%). But four cycles were associated with worse overall survival (79.12%) and higher incidence of treatment‐related toxicities. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of induction cycles and lymph node classification were prognostic factors. Conclusions Two and three cycles of induction chemotherapy are associated with similar survival, while four cycles reduce survival and increase treatment‐related toxicity in endemic regions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI