曲妥珠单抗
体内分布
医学
药理学
癌症
内科学
乳腺癌
化学
体外
生物化学
作者
Jessica Pougoue Ketchemen,Fabrice Ngoh Njotu,Hanan Babeker,Alissar Monzer,Emmanuel Nwangele,Anjong Florence Tikum,Nikita Henning,Nava Hassani,Sarah Frye,Randy Perron,Chris Byrne,Candice Didychuk,Qi Qi,Laura Bannister,Alireza Doroudi,Humphrey Fonge
标识
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1779
摘要
Abstract Purpose: There is overwhelming interest to use actinium-225 ([225Ac]Ac) to develop targeted α therapies. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADC) are highly cytotoxic. Combining [225Ac]Ac with an ADC to develop an antibody–drug radioconjugate [225Ac]Ac–macropa–trastuzumab(T)–PEG6–emtansine (DM1), is expected to be more effective than its ADC (T–PEG6–DM1) against breast cancer. Experimental Design: [89Zr]Zr–p-isothiocyanatobenzyl desferrioxamine (DFO)–T–PEG6–DM1 (imaging) and [225Ac]Ac–macropa–T–PEG6–DM1 (radiotherapy) were developed. Biodistribution and safety evaluations of [225Ac]Ac–macropa–T-PEG6–DM1 were carried out in non–tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. MicroPET imaging and biodistribution were done using [89Zr]Zr-DFO–T–PEG6–DM1, and radiotherapy using [225Ac]Ac–macropa–T–PEG6–DM1 was carried out in athymic BALB/c nude mice bearing trastuzumab-resistant HCC1954 and trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1)/trastuzumab-resistant JIMT-1 tumor-bearing mice. Results: After 7 days of incubation at 37°C, [225Ac]Ac–macropa–T–PEG6–DM1 was stable in both human serum (89.2% ± 0.9%) and PBS (82.8% ± 0.4%). T–PEG6–DM1 (8 mg/kg) and [225Ac]Ac–macropa–T–PEG6–DM1 (3 × 18 kBq) administered separately in non–tumor-bearing mice 10 days apart were well tolerated biochemically and hematologically. Imaging and biodistribution showed high tumor uptake of [89Zr]Zr-DFO–T–PEG6–DM1 in tumor-bearing mice at 120 hours after injection: 38.1% ± 2.8% IA/g (HCC1954) and 14.6% ± 1% IA/g (JIMT-1). In HCC1954 tumor-bearing mice, all treatment groups had complete remission (8/8), indicative of the responsiveness of the xenograft to T-DM1–based treatments, whereas for JIMT-1 xenografts (having 1/8 complete remission) at 23 days after treatment, tumor volumes were 332.1 ± 77.5 vs. 244.6 ± 63 vs. 417.9 ± 62.1 vs. 102.4 ± 18.5 for the saline (negative control), T-DM1 (positive control), T–PEG6–DM1, and [225Ac]Ac–macropa–T–PEG6–DM1, respectively. Conclusions: [225Ac]Ac–macropa–T–PEG6–DM1 is more potent than ADC against trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer and necessitates clinical translation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI