多元化(营销策略)
农业
自然资源经济学
外部性
业务
生物多样性
生态系统服务
环境资源管理
农业多样化
单作
统一
粮食安全
生态系统
环境规划
经济
生态学
地理
营销
生物
物理
声学
微观经济学
作者
Laura Vang Rasmussen,Ingo Graß,Zia Mehrabi,Olivia M. Smith,Rachel Bezner Kerr,Jennifer Blesh,Lucas A. Garibaldi,Marney E. Isaac,Christina M. Kennedy,Hannah Wittman,Péter Batáry,Damayanti Buchori,Rolando Cerda,Julián Chará,David W. Crowder,Kevin Darras,Kathryn Teigen DeMaster,Karina García,Manuel Gómez,David J. Gonthier
出处
期刊:Science
[American Association for the Advancement of Science]
日期:2024-04-04
卷期号:384 (6691): 87-93
被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.1126/science.adj1914
摘要
Agricultural simplification continues to expand at the expense of more diverse forms of agriculture. This simplification, for example, in the form of intensively managed monocultures, poses a risk to keeping the world within safe and just Earth system boundaries. Here, we estimated how agricultural diversification simultaneously affects social and environmental outcomes. Drawing from 24 studies in 11 countries across 2655 farms, we show how five diversification strategies focusing on livestock, crops, soils, noncrop plantings, and water conservation benefit social (e.g., human well-being, yields, and food security) and environmental (e.g., biodiversity, ecosystem services, and reduced environmental externalities) outcomes. We found that applying multiple diversification strategies creates more positive outcomes than individual management strategies alone. To realize these benefits, well-designed policies are needed to incentivize the adoption of multiple diversification strategies in unison.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI