Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Atrial fibrillation significantly increases the risk of ischemic stroke, with thrombi primarily originating in the left atrial appendage (LAA). While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the standard for stroke prevention, LAA occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a nonpharmacologic alternative, particularly for patients at high bleeding risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis included 15 studies (1 randomized control trial and 14 observational studies) encompassing 22,420 patients (10,704 LAAO, 11,716 DOAC). LAAO and DOACs demonstrated comparable thromboembolic event rates. LAAO was associated with significantly lower risks of stroke/transient ischemic attack (risk ratio: 0.86, P = 0.0004), major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR): 0.74, P = 0.03], cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.57, P < 0.00001), and all-cause mortality (risk ratio 0.66, P = 0.006). The composite outcome significantly favored LAAO (HR: 0.67, P = 0.0008). No significant difference was found in intracranial bleeding rates.