Frequency and clinical features of germline pathogenic variants in sarcoma: a case-control study
作者
A. Rodríguez,Miki Horiguchi,Carolyn Horton,Linda M. Polfus,Brittany Bychkovsky,Ryan M. Buehler,Suzanne George,Priscilla Merriam,Judy E. Garber,Huma Rana
Abstract Background Germline multigene panel testing is not yet integrated into standard care for patients with sarcoma. This study aimed to assess the frequency and distribution of germline pathogenic variants in patients with sarcoma compared with cancer-free controls and identify differences between patients with and without germline pathogenic variants. Methods This retrospective cohort included 488 sarcoma patients and 2440 cancer-free controls matched 1:5 by age, sex, and ethnicity. Multigene panel testing was performed between 2016 and 2024 at a single germline testing laboratory. The frequency of germline pathogenic variants in selected genes was compared using Fisher exact test with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. Additionally, within the case-only cohort, clinical characteristics were evaluated to assess associations with the presence of germline pathogenic variants in any gene. Results Among 488 patients with sarcoma, 67.8% (n = 331) were female, with a median age at sarcoma diagnosis of 47 years (range = 0.5-87.5 years). Cases had a higher frequency of germline pathogenic variants compared with controls (26.2% vs 10.5%; OR = 3.05, P < .001). We observed a higher frequency of germline pathogenic variants in TP53, BRCA2, CHEK2, NF1, SDHA, BRIP1, POT1, RB1, and CDH1 among patients with sarcoma compared with controls. Age at sarcoma diagnosis did not differ between groups. Conclusions This study confirms the high detection rate of germline pathogenic variants in patients with sarcoma and describes several associated genes. These findings indicate that age at sarcoma diagnosis may not reliably predict germline pathogenic variants. Expanding germline testing for patients with sarcoma would enhance personalized treatment strategies and familial risk assessment.