Comparison of Wait‐List Mortality Between Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Transplant Candidates

医学 肝细胞癌 肝移植 内科学 米兰标准 胃肠病学 普通外科 肿瘤科 移植
作者
Ioannis A. Ziogas,Laura Hickman,Lea Matsuoka,Manhal Izzy,Martin I. Montenovo,Scott A. Rega,Irene D. Feurer,Sophoclis P. Alexopoulos
出处
期刊:Liver Transplantation [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:26 (9): 1112-1120 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1002/lt.25807
摘要

Despite the divergent disease biology of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), wait‐list prioritization is identical for both diagnoses. We compared wait‐list and posttransplant outcomes between CCA and HCC liver transplantation patients with Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease exceptions using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. The 408 CCA candidates listed between 2003 and mid‐2017 were matched to 2 HCC cohorts by listing date (±2 months, n = 816) and by Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) region and date (±6 months, n = 408). Cumulative incidence competing risk regression examined the effects of diagnosis, OPTN region, and center‐level CCA listing volume on wait‐list removal due to death/being too ill (dropout). Cox models evaluated the effects of diagnosis, OPTN region, center‐level CCA volume, and waiting time on graft failure among deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. After adjusting for OPTN region and CCA listing volume (all P ≥ 0.07), both HCC cohorts had a reduced likelihood of wait‐list dropout compared with CCA candidates (HCC with period matching only: subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43‐0.93; P = 0.02 and HCC with OPTN region and period matching: SHR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41‐0.87; P = 0.007). The cumulative incidence rates of wait‐list dropout at 6 and 12 months were 13.2% (95% CI, 10.0%‐17.0%) and 23.9% (95% CI, 20.0%‐29.0%) for CCA candidates, 7.3% (95% CI, 5.0%‐10.0%) and 12.7% (95% CI, 10.0%‐17.0%) for HCC candidates with region and listing date matching, and 7.1% (95% CI, 5.0%‐9.0%) and 12.6% (95% CI, 10.0%‐15.0%) for HCC candidates with listing date matching only. Additionally, HCC DDLT recipients had a 57% reduced risk of graft failure compared with CCA recipients ( P < 0.001). Waiting time was unrelated to graft failure ( P = 0.57), and there was no waiting time by diagnosis cohort interaction effect ( P = 0.47). When identically prioritized, LT candidates with CCA have increased wait‐list dropout compared with those with HCC. More granular data are necessary to discern ways to mitigate this wait‐list disadvantage and improve survival for patients with CCA.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
log_10x发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
JamesPei应助无心的天真采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Akim应助拼搏的沅采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
颜开完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Hello应助正直的阑悦采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
豆豆完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
研友_nV21Vn发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
漫步云端发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
wei发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
斯文败类应助Dotuu采纳,获得10
4秒前
丘比特应助咖啡采纳,获得10
4秒前
DJDJDDDJ完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
牛马发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
HikyoLee发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
lqiqivv发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
hbhbj发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
hong应助糕糕采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
Lucas应助颜开采纳,获得10
6秒前
鲤鱼平蓝发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
Wang完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
共享精神应助乙酰CoA采纳,获得10
7秒前
zzy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
小凤完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
LEOJAY发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
善学以致用应助王小红采纳,获得10
8秒前
tl完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
圆蓬蓬发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
liushikai应助七七采纳,获得20
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6048640
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7833109
关于积分的说明 16260257
捐赠科研通 5193939
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2779163
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1762455
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1644649