医学
哮喘
随机对照试验
恶化
不利影响
置信区间
最小临床重要差异
生活质量(医疗保健)
荟萃分析
需要治疗的数量
内科学
物理疗法
临床试验
优势比
入射(几何)
前瞻性队列研究
梅德林
系统回顾
重症监护医学
相对风险
哮喘恶化
比率
临床终点
作者
Shun Nakahara,Maria Júlia Hallack Moura,Sumeyye K. Cengiz,Manoel F. Filho,Jafar Aljazeeri
标识
DOI:10.1080/17476348.2026.2688299
摘要
Introduction Patients with eosinophilic asthma are at increased risk of poor asthma control despite optimized standard therapy. Depemokimab, a novel long-acting anti – interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, has shown efficacy in reducing exacerbations; however, its effects across clinical outcomes have not been comprehensively synthesized.Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing depemokimab with placebo. Outcomes included Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5), asthma exacerbation rate, quality of life assessed by St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and adverse events. Results were reported as mean differences (MDs) or incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.Results Four RCTs (n = 954) were included. Depemokimab did not significantly improve ACQ-5 (MD -0.30; 95% CI -0.92 to 0.32; I2 = 73.6%; p = 0.23), but reduced exacerbation rates (IRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.59; I2 = 0%; p < 0.001) and modestly improved SGRQ scores without reaching the MCID (MD -2.80; 95% CI -5.38 to -0.23; I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.033). Safety was comparable to placebo.Conclusions Depemokimab reduced exacerbations and had a comparable safety profile, but did not improve symptom control or achieve the MCID for health-related quality-of-life.Registration The study protocol was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number CRD420261282685).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI