Is small airway dysfunction an abnormal phenomenon for patients with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second and the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity?

The clinical significance of small airway dysfunction (SAD) determined with spirometry in patients with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and the ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) is controversial.To determine whether SAD presents histologic abnormalities in the setting of normal computed tomography (CT) imaging and FEV1 and FEV1/FVC.A cross-sectional study was performed in 64 patients undergoing thoracotomy for pulmonary nodules. Thoracic high-resolution CT (HRCT), bronchodilation test, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) and its alveolar component (nitric oxide alveolar concentration [CANO]) were obtained before surgery. Lung pathology and levels of cytokines in lung tissue were measured. The patients were divided into SAD and small airway normal function groups according to forced expiratory flow at 75% and 50% of the FVC (maximal expiratory flow [MEF] 25, MEF50) and maximum midexpiratory flow.The MEF50, MEF25, and maximum midexpiratory flow were strongly negatively correlated with CANO (r, -0.42, -0.42, -0.40, respectively; P ≤ .001 for all). The MEFs were mildly negatively correlated with interleukin (IL)-6 and macrophages in lung tissue (r < -0.25, P < .001 for all). The CANO (P < .001), airspace size (mean linear intercept) (P = .02), macrophages (P = .003), IL-6 (P = .003), and IL-8 (P = .008) in lung tissue were higher in patients with SAD (n = 35) than those with small airway normal function (n = 29). A total of 8 patients (22.86%) with SAD and 2 (6.90%) without SAD had pneumatoceles (P = .10).Patients with pulmonary nodules and SAD were more likely to have abnormal inflammation and emphysematous destruction than patients without SAD. Thus, SAD indicates histologic abnormalities in patients with normal CT imaging and FEV1 and FEV1/FVC.