Comparison of linezolid step-down therapy to standard parenteral therapy in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections

Data supporting oral step-down therapy in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) are sparse; linezolid offers potential in this setting. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of oral step-down linezolid compared with standard parenteral therapy (SPT) in MRSA-BSI. This was a retrospective cohort performed in adults receiving step-down/outpatient linezolid or SPT (vancomycin, daptomycin) for MRSA-BSI from 2011-2019. Primary outcome was 90-day infection-related re-admission (IRR) from clinical worsening/relapse or infection recurrence. 215 patients included (54 linezolid, 161 SPT). Infection sources were skin (34%), bone/joint (15%), endocarditis (13%), other (32%), multiple (6%). Patients receiving SPT more commonly had complicated bacteraemia (72% vs. 41%; P < 0.0001) and metastatic foci (45% vs. 20%; P = 0.001). 90-day IRR occurred in 17% and 26% of linezolid and SPT groups, respectively (P = 0.159). When accounting for disease severity, linezolid use was not independently associated with 90-day IRR (adjOR, 1.0, 95% CI 0.24-4.3; P = 0.986). There were no differences in all-cause 90-day mortality (4% vs. 6%, P = 0.487) or overall incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) (17% vs. 16%; P = 0.843) between the groups. More patients in the SPT group developed an AE requiring re-hospitalisation (12% vs. 2%; P = 0.024), most commonly line-related complications. Oral step-down linezolid demonstrated similar clinical and safety outcomes compared with SPT for MRSA-BSI, except linezolid was associated with fewer AEs requiring re-hospitalisation. Additional research is needed exploring step-down linezolid in MRSA-BSI, particularly in patients requiring shorter durations of outpatient therapy.