Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer (Br J Surg DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7537)

医学 偏爱 癌症 普通外科 内科学 统计 数学
作者
Jane Blazeby
出处
期刊:British Journal of Surgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:98 (8): 1132-1132 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1002/bjs.7585
摘要

Background: Establishing preferences for surgery is paramount to preoperative patient counselling.This study aimed to prioritize and compare preferences of patients and doctors towards surgery for oesophagogastric cancer, to aid the counselling process.Methods: A discrete-choice questionnaire containing hypothetical scenarios was designed to test patient preferences for six treatment attributes: mortality, morbidity, quality of life (QoL), cure rate, hospital type and surgeon's reputation.The survey was mailed to all patients who underwent oesophagogastric cancer resection from 2008 to 2009 at two teaching hospital sites.All doctors at these sites with previous experience in counselling patients for cancer surgery were also identified and presented with the survey.Results were analysed using a random-effects probit regression model.Spearman correlation was used to compare participants' implicit choices from the discrete-choice scenarios (their true preferences) with their explicit choices from the direct ranking of preferences (their perceived preferences).Results: Eighty-one patients and 90 doctors completed the survey.Some 15 per cent of patients and 31 per cent of doctors based their choices solely on QoL.In order of importance, patients based their implicit responses on QoL (β = 1•19), cure rate (β = 0•82), morbidity (β = -0•70), surgeon's reputation (β = 0•60), mortality (β = -0•57) and hospital type (β = 0•26).Doctors similarly indicated QoL (β = 1•14) and hospital type (β = 0•31) as highest and lowest preferences respectively, but placed far greater emphasis on mortality (β = -0•80) than morbidity (β = -0•35).Implicit and explicit preferences correlated only for morbidity and surgeon's reputation in the patient cohort.Conclusion: Clinicians may better meet patients' expectations and facilitate informed decision-making if QoL, cure rate and morbidity are emphasized foremost.A similar study employing preoperative patients is warranted for further clarification of preferences.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
正版DY完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
Paulwu完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
酷波er应助小罗采纳,获得10
2秒前
demonapple12完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
XIN完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
Mavis完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
4秒前
李欢发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
huangxinping发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Akim应助西洲采纳,获得10
5秒前
Philwen完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
cdercder应助失眠的惜天采纳,获得30
5秒前
秀丽的愚志完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
大个应助June17采纳,获得10
5秒前
阳光孤容发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
威武的盼海完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
摸鱼发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小牛牛发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小羊发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
小太阳完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
好彭友_RSRS完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
残酷月光完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
arniu2008发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
124发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助隔壁的小民采纳,获得10
9秒前
yw完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
任鑫宇发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
New directions for experimental lessons in science teaching: Myth, Mystery, Necessity? by Emily K. da Silva Cunha Souto (Author), Flávia Lins Silva (Author) 333
Scientific experimentation in the classroom: Comparison between genetic-Socratic-exemplary teaching and workshop teaching by Ingrid Hofer (Author) 333
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6719916
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8456766
关于积分的说明 18054233
捐赠科研通 5971202
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2995860
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1971867
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1925158