Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer (Br J Surg DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7537)

医学 偏爱 癌症 普通外科 内科学 统计 数学
作者
Jane Blazeby
出处
期刊:British Journal of Surgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:98 (8): 1132-1132 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1002/bjs.7585
摘要

Background: Establishing preferences for surgery is paramount to preoperative patient counselling.This study aimed to prioritize and compare preferences of patients and doctors towards surgery for oesophagogastric cancer, to aid the counselling process.Methods: A discrete-choice questionnaire containing hypothetical scenarios was designed to test patient preferences for six treatment attributes: mortality, morbidity, quality of life (QoL), cure rate, hospital type and surgeon's reputation.The survey was mailed to all patients who underwent oesophagogastric cancer resection from 2008 to 2009 at two teaching hospital sites.All doctors at these sites with previous experience in counselling patients for cancer surgery were also identified and presented with the survey.Results were analysed using a random-effects probit regression model.Spearman correlation was used to compare participants' implicit choices from the discrete-choice scenarios (their true preferences) with their explicit choices from the direct ranking of preferences (their perceived preferences).Results: Eighty-one patients and 90 doctors completed the survey.Some 15 per cent of patients and 31 per cent of doctors based their choices solely on QoL.In order of importance, patients based their implicit responses on QoL (β = 1•19), cure rate (β = 0•82), morbidity (β = -0•70), surgeon's reputation (β = 0•60), mortality (β = -0•57) and hospital type (β = 0•26).Doctors similarly indicated QoL (β = 1•14) and hospital type (β = 0•31) as highest and lowest preferences respectively, but placed far greater emphasis on mortality (β = -0•80) than morbidity (β = -0•35).Implicit and explicit preferences correlated only for morbidity and surgeon's reputation in the patient cohort.Conclusion: Clinicians may better meet patients' expectations and facilitate informed decision-making if QoL, cure rate and morbidity are emphasized foremost.A similar study employing preoperative patients is warranted for further clarification of preferences.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
最长的旅途完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
Jasper应助Qianwen采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
jin完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
阿布来也发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Owen应助宋宋采纳,获得10
3秒前
二号发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
PORCO完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
天天快乐应助三块石头采纳,获得10
4秒前
ayynl完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ddd完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
乐乐应助Dream采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
宸一完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
senli2018发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
邢寻冬发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
阳光尔云应助YM采纳,获得10
7秒前
明理的小甜瓜完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
动听筮发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
FashionBoy应助静香采纳,获得10
8秒前
丘比特应助111采纳,获得10
8秒前
Owen应助senli2018采纳,获得10
8秒前
jixia发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
tlc_191026发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
无花果应助缥缈哈密瓜采纳,获得10
11秒前
犹豫煜城完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
快乐小狗发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
dog完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Jasper应助落后的高山采纳,获得10
13秒前
klkl发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6438950
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8253051
关于积分的说明 17564109
捐赠科研通 5497169
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2899173
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1875802
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1716511