Reliability of computed molecular structures

When the structures of 1342 molecules are optimized by 30 methods and 7 basis sets, there appear 289 (21.54%) problematic molecules and 112 (8.35%) failed ones. When 278 problematic molecules are compared, the best methods are BHandH and LC-wPBE, while B97D, BP86, HFS, VSXC, and HCTH are very unreliable. When 179 problematic molecules are computed with larger basis sets, the smallest mean absolute deviation (MAD) of bond angle (2.3°) is shown by QCISD(T)/cc-pVTZ, while the smallest MAD of bond length (0.021 Å), the best SUM1 (4.9 unit), and the best SUM2 (2.4 unit) are shown by DSDPBEP86(Full), DSDPBEP86, PBE1PBE-D3, MP2, and MP2(Full) in combination with aug-cc-pVQZ, cc-pVQZ, Def2QZVP, Def2TZVPP, and/or 6-311++G(3df,3pd). Very large basis sets, for example, larger than cc-pVTZ usually have to be used to obtain very good structures and the performances of many density-functional theory methods are encouraging. The best results may be the limit of modern computational chemistry.