转化式学习
范围(计算机科学)
边疆
知识管理
现存分类群
社会学
新兴技术
工程伦理学
计算机科学
政治学
工程类
人工智能
程序设计语言
法学
生物
进化生物学
教育学
作者
Haiyun Xu,Hongshen Pang,Jos Winnink,Rui Luo,Chao Wang
标识
DOI:10.1177/01655515211061865
摘要
The definition of ‘transformative innovation’ is still ambiguous, making it difficult to develop more targeted strategies for steering scientific and technological innovation. In this study, taking extant academic publications as our research object, we used topic extraction and visualisation tools to explore the intersections and differences among transformative and other innovative concepts. The correlation degrees among the concepts related to ‘transformative innovation’ were used to distinguish the relationships among concepts related to ‘breakthrough innovation’ and ‘disruptive innovation’. We further analysed the definitional differences among ‘transformative innovation’, ‘emerging technology’ and ‘groundbreaking research’. The results showed that the concepts of ‘breakthrough innovation’ and ‘disruptive innovation’ can be integrated into the scope of ‘transformative innovation’. However, the definitions of ‘transformative innovation’, ‘emerging technology’ and ‘research frontier’ had their distinct characteristics. ‘Transformative innovation’ focused on major impactful technological changes. ‘Emerging technology’ focused on novel technology and its promoting. ‘Research frontier’ focused on research activities taking place at the frontiers of knowledge. Therefore, distinctive science and technology (S&T) policies are needed for the different types of innovation. This article introduces a novel multidimensional method to place the different concepts associated with ‘transformative innovation’ into a unified framework. This framework is expected to support policymakers in their S&T policymaking, and it would aid the work of S&T researchers.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI