Evaluation of Safety Outcomes of Undiluted Levetiracetam Intravenous Push Compared to Intravenous Piggyback

医学 左乙拉西坦 麻醉 急诊医学 癫痫 精神科
作者
Ashley Shim,Sara Radparvar,Nicole Davis,Andrew Kaplan,Kyriaki Kantaris,Amanda Devlin,John Liang,Francesco Ciummo
出处
期刊:Journal of Pharmacy Practice [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:37 (3): 722-727 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1177/08971900231176457
摘要

Background: Breakthrough seizures and status epilepticus require urgent management. Administration of intravenous push (IVP) levetiracetam has been demonstrated to be safe as compared to intravenous piggyback (IVPB). This transition can potentially offer faster time to administration and reduced drug and material cost. The objective of this study was to observe safety of administration in patients receiving levetiracetam via IVP compared to IVPB in acute care settings. Methods: This is a multi-center, observational, retrospective cohort study of 1214 adult patients who received levetiracetam pre- and post-implementation of IVP over a 6 month timespan. Primary outcome was time from order verification to administration of urgent first-time doses. Secondary outcomes included time to administration of loading doses and cost. Safety outcome was infusion site related reactions. Results: Time from order verification to administration of urgent first-time doses pre- and post-implementation of IVP administration was reduced from 61 minutes to 47 minutes ( P=0.0002). Infusion site related reactions were observed in 6 out of 5432 doses in the IVPB arm and in 5 out of 4700 doses in the IVP arm ( P=1). Total estimated cost was $76,171.96 for the 5449 IVPB total doses and $11,484.33 for the 4721 IVP total doses. Conclusions: Transition from IVPB to IVP administration reduced time from order verification to administration of urgent first-time doses with both administrations having similar incidence of infusion site related reactions. Cost savings and improved workflow were observed. Levetiracetam administered via IVP may be considered as a safe alternative method of administration in the acute care setting.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
完美世界的应助被顺心绮兰采纳,获得10
刚刚
one发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
aaabbb完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
黄文洁发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Hello的应助被六六七七采纳,获得10
1秒前
星辰大海的应助被深林狼采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
puzhongjiMiQ发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
xiaoblue发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
姜有明发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
marklee发布了新的文献求助50
3秒前
3秒前
晴天完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Herik发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
panpan发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
李过儿完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
老实如松完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
兔子精完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
英俊的铭的应助被正直谷芹采纳,获得10
5秒前
玥洋完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Lucas的应助被超人也读博采纳,获得10
6秒前
Lucas的应助被鱼鱼鱼采纳,获得10
6秒前
Jasper的应助被biotnt采纳,获得10
6秒前
ddd完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
babyapple发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Faye发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
研友_8QyXr8发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Critical Bildung: Hegel and the Logic of Diremption 500
桑白皮エキスの実験的, 臨床的育毛効果について 500
Qualitative Methodologies in Tourism Studies: Disrupting and Co-creating Critical Research 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8036953
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9472675
关于积分的说明 21261370
捐赠科研通 7606446
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3390256
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2522090
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2427549