离子迁移光谱法
漂移管,漂移管
化学
模块化设计
相对标准差
功率(物理)
离子
构造(python库)
分析化学(期刊)
标准差
质谱法
计算机科学
色谱法
统计
热力学
检出限
物理
有机化学
数学
程序设计语言
操作系统
作者
Cameron N. Naylor,Elvin R. Cabrera,Brian H. Clowers
标识
DOI:10.1021/jasms.2c00308
摘要
As the spectrum of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) applications expands and more experimental configurations are developed, identifying the correct platform for an experimental campaign becomes more challenging for researchers. Additionally, metrics that compare performance (Rp, for example) often have nuanced differences in definition between platforms that render direct comparisons difficult. Here we present a comparison of three do-it-yourself (DIY) drift tubes that are relatively low cost and easy to construct, where the performance of each is evaluated based on three different metrics: resolving power, the ideality of resolving powers, and accuracy/precision of K0 values. The standard PCBIMS design developed by Reinecke and Clowers (Reinecke, T.; Clowers, B. H. HardwareX 2018, 4, e00030) provided the highest resolving power (>90) and the highest ideality of resolving power ratios (>90% at best) of the three systems. However, the flexible tube (FlexIMS) construction as described by Smith et al. (Smith, B. L. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92 (13), 9104−9112) exhibited the highest degree of precision of K0 values (relative standard deviation of <0.42%). Depending on the application, the drift tube variants presented and evaluated here offer a low-cost alternative to commercial drift-tube systems with levels of performance that approach theoretical maxima.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI