已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

AI ‐generated dermatologic images show deficient skin tone diversity and poor diagnostic accuracy: An experimental study

医学 人口统计学的 皮肤病科 多样性(政治) 人口学 人类学 社会学
作者
Lucie Joerg,Margaret Kabakova,Jennifer Y. Wang,Evan Austin,Marc Cohen,Alana Kurtti,Jared Jagdeo
出处
期刊:Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology [Wiley]
卷期号:39 (12): 2134-2141 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1111/jdv.20849
摘要

Abstract Background Generative AI models are increasingly used in dermatology, yet biases in training datasets may reduce diagnostic accuracy and perpetuate ethnic health disparities. Objectives To evaluate two key AI outputs: (1) skin tone representation and (2) diagnostic accuracy of generated dermatologic conditions. Methods Using the standard prompt ‘Generate a photo of a person with [skin condition],’ this cross‐sectional study investigated skin tone diversity and accuracy of four leading AI models—Adobe Firefly, ChatGPT‐4o, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion—across the 20 most common skin conditions. All images ( n = 4000) were evaluated for skin tone representation from June to July 2024. Two independent raters used the Fitzpatrick scale to assess skin tone diversity compared to U.S. Census demographics using χ 2 . Two blinded dermatology residents evaluated a randomized 200‐image subset for diagnostic accuracy. An inter‐rater kappa statistic was calculated to assess rater agreement. Results Across all generated images, 89.8% depicted light skin, and 10.2% depicted dark skin. Adobe Firefly demonstrated the highest alignment with U.S. demographic data, with a non‐significant chi‐square result (38.1% dark skin, χ 2 (1) = 0.320, p = 0.572), indicating no meaningful difference between its generated skin tone diversity and census demographics. ChatGPT‐4o, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion significantly underrepresented dark skin with Fitzpatrick scores of >IV (6.0%, 3.9% and 8.7% dark skin, respectively; all p < 0.001). Across all platforms, only 15% of images were identifiable by raters as the intended condition. Adobe Firefly had the lowest accuracy (0.94%), while ChatGPT‐4o, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion demonstrated higher but still suboptimal accuracy (22%, 12.2% and 22.5%, respectively). Conclusions The study highlights substantial deficiencies in the diversity and accuracy of AI‐generated dermatological images. AI programs may exacerbate cognitive bias and health inequity, suggesting the need for ethical AI guidelines and diverse datasets to improve disease diagnosis and dermatologic care.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
嗯啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
拼搏的邴发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
talassa发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
Min完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ybh发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
kk完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
今后应助陈凯鸿采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
12秒前
13秒前
岸然发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
科研通AI6.2应助笨笨代容采纳,获得10
14秒前
肥鲸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
大个应助liberty采纳,获得10
15秒前
Amadeus发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
英俊的铭应助yizhixiaobujin采纳,获得20
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
LL发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
大饼饼饼完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
talassa完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
orixero应助读的就是文献采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
勤劳盼易完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
丘比特应助王乾宇采纳,获得10
24秒前
雪山冰川发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
勤劳琦发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
25秒前
25秒前
LD发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
充电宝应助赵mmmqqq采纳,获得10
28秒前
99668发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Physiologic specialization in Peronospora manshurica 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7777581
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9318485
关于积分的说明 20364575
捐赠科研通 7364543
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3318952
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2466621
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2334202