AI ‐generated dermatologic images show deficient skin tone diversity and poor diagnostic accuracy: An experimental study

医学 人口统计学的 皮肤病科 多样性(政治) 人口学 人类学 社会学
作者
Lucie Joerg,Margaret Kabakova,Jennifer Y. Wang,Evan Austin,Marc Cohen,Alana Kurtti,Jared Jagdeo
出处
期刊:Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology [Wiley]
卷期号:39 (12): 2134-2141 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1111/jdv.20849
摘要

Abstract Background Generative AI models are increasingly used in dermatology, yet biases in training datasets may reduce diagnostic accuracy and perpetuate ethnic health disparities. Objectives To evaluate two key AI outputs: (1) skin tone representation and (2) diagnostic accuracy of generated dermatologic conditions. Methods Using the standard prompt ‘Generate a photo of a person with [skin condition],’ this cross‐sectional study investigated skin tone diversity and accuracy of four leading AI models—Adobe Firefly, ChatGPT‐4o, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion—across the 20 most common skin conditions. All images ( n = 4000) were evaluated for skin tone representation from June to July 2024. Two independent raters used the Fitzpatrick scale to assess skin tone diversity compared to U.S. Census demographics using χ 2 . Two blinded dermatology residents evaluated a randomized 200‐image subset for diagnostic accuracy. An inter‐rater kappa statistic was calculated to assess rater agreement. Results Across all generated images, 89.8% depicted light skin, and 10.2% depicted dark skin. Adobe Firefly demonstrated the highest alignment with U.S. demographic data, with a non‐significant chi‐square result (38.1% dark skin, χ 2 (1) = 0.320, p = 0.572), indicating no meaningful difference between its generated skin tone diversity and census demographics. ChatGPT‐4o, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion significantly underrepresented dark skin with Fitzpatrick scores of >IV (6.0%, 3.9% and 8.7% dark skin, respectively; all p < 0.001). Across all platforms, only 15% of images were identifiable by raters as the intended condition. Adobe Firefly had the lowest accuracy (0.94%), while ChatGPT‐4o, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion demonstrated higher but still suboptimal accuracy (22%, 12.2% and 22.5%, respectively). Conclusions The study highlights substantial deficiencies in the diversity and accuracy of AI‐generated dermatological images. AI programs may exacerbate cognitive bias and health inequity, suggesting the need for ethical AI guidelines and diverse datasets to improve disease diagnosis and dermatologic care.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
受伤的擎宇应助李浩采纳,获得30
1秒前
weiyayayayayaya完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zzzrrr完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
yueyue完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
断水断粮的科研民工完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
oaixlittle完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
zuihaodewomen完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Ting完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
啊是是是完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
地表飞猪应助林韵悠扬采纳,获得10
5秒前
芝士就是力量完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
思思完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
慕容冰璃完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
orixero应助奥丁蒂法采纳,获得10
6秒前
AO完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
lzr完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
张无凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
jh完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Katyusha完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
yao完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
wenjing完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
若E18完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
季刘杰完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
自觉沛文完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
猪猪hero发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
温婉完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
简单向露完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
kk完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
HF完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
图南完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Kearoroa完成签到 ,获得积分20
16秒前
细心白竹完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
save完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
斯人发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
充电宝应助lily采纳,获得10
17秒前
whyme完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
全自动闯祸机完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 2000
Psychology and Work Today 1000
Research for Social Workers 1000
Mastering New Drug Applications: A Step-by-Step Guide (Mastering the FDA Approval Process Book 1) 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5901182
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6751714
关于积分的说明 15747497
捐赠科研通 5024461
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2705696
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1653618
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1600481