Predicting psychologists’ approach to academic reciprocity and data sharing with a theory of collective action

互惠(文化人类学) 声誉 数据共享 集体行动 心理学 社会心理学 独创性 感知 测量数据收集 公共关系 社会学 政治学 社会科学 医学 统计 替代医学 数学 病理 神经科学 政治 创造力 法学
作者
Tae Hee Lee,Minsun Jung,Youngseek Kim
出处
期刊:The Electronic Library [Emerald Publishing Limited]
卷期号:41 (2/3): 223-241
标识
DOI:10.1108/el-10-2022-0232
摘要

Purpose This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the data sharing habits of psychologists with respect to academic reciprocity. Design/methodology/approach A research model was developed based on Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action to map psychologists’ underlying motivations for data sharing. The model was validated by data from a survey of 427 psychologists, primarily from the psychological sciences and related disciplines. Findings This study found that data sharing among psychologists is driven primarily by their perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and the norms of data sharing. This study also found that academic reciprocity is significantly influenced by psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing. Both academic reputation and academic reciprocity are affected by psychologists’ prior experiences with data reuse. Additionally, psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits and the norms of data sharing are significantly affected by the perception of their academic reputation. Research limitations/implications This study suggests that Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action can provide a new theoretical lens in understanding psychologists’ data sharing behaviours. Practical implications This study suggests several practical implications for the design and promotion of data sharing in the research community of psychology. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the initial studies that applied the theory of collective action to the mechanisms of reputation, community benefits, norms and reciprocity in psychologists’ data sharing behaviour. This research demonstrates that perceived community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing can all encourage academic reciprocity, and psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and data sharing norms all facilitate their data sharing intentions.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
chua1212123发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
华仔应助soulking采纳,获得10
刚刚
野火不吃折耳根完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
炖地瓜完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
酸辣个土豆完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
Owen应助与一人同游采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
周伯通发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小狗不爱睡懒觉完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Myt完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科研通AI6.1应助梅梅采纳,获得10
3秒前
Cnak发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Threeeeeee发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Akim应助楚子航采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
fyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
少年珮完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
科研通AI6.2应助哲学家采纳,获得10
6秒前
Kevin完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
孙修哲应助文件撤销了驳回
6秒前
小棉背心完成签到 ,获得积分0
7秒前
X_x完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
就是觉得无聊完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
MGR完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
kgf完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Loemteigaan完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
等待蜜蜂完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
起風了完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
hrzmlily完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
seawolf168完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Song完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
tuzhihong完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
葡萄狗完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
10秒前
小羊学学学完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
1111完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
Fundamentals of Modern Mathematics: A Practical Review (Dover Books on Mathematics) 500
Cold War Transcended: Australia's China Policy, 1949-1990 470
Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age, 2nd Edition 400
Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy 10th Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6617669
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8381923
关于积分的说明 17932108
捐赠科研通 5787034
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2959884
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1935130
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1839742