Safety of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Involving More than 8,000 Patients

医学 骨关节炎 不利影响 生理盐水 随机对照试验 透明质酸 荟萃分析 相对风险 关节内 外科 临床试验 增粘剂 内科学 安慰剂 科克伦图书馆 物理疗法 置信区间 病理 替代医学 解剖
作者
Larry E. Miller,Samir Bhattacharyya,William R. Parrish,Michael Fredericson,Brad Bisson,Roy D. Altman
出处
期刊:Cartilage [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:13 (1_suppl): 351S-363S 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1177/1947603519888783
摘要

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report the safety of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).We identified randomized controlled trials reporting the safety of IAHA versus IA saline in adults with symptomatic knee OA. Main safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs), local AEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), study withdrawals, and AE-related study withdrawals.A total of 35 randomized controlled trials with 38 group comparisons comprising 8,078 unique patients (IAHA: 4,295, IA saline: 3,783) were included in the meta-analysis. Comparing IAHA with IA saline over a median of 6 months follow-up, there were no differences in the risk of AEs (42.4% vs. 39.7%, risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.96-1.07, P = 0.61), SAEs (1.8% vs. 1.2%, RR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.91-2.26, P=0.12), study withdrawals (12.3% vs. 12.7%, RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.87-1.12, P = 0.83), or AE-related study withdrawals (2.7% vs. 2.1%, RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.97-1.93, P = 0.08). Local AEs, all of which were nonserious, were more common with IAHA vs. IA saline (14.5% vs. 11.7%, RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.07-1.36, P = 0.003) and typically resolved within days.IAHA was shown to be safe for use in patients with symptomatic knee OA. Compared with IA saline, IAHA is associated with an increased risk of nonserious, transient local reactions. There was no evidence to suggest any additional safety risks of IAHA.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
麦冬冬完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
明理的小甜瓜完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
changping应助小白菜采纳,获得10
2秒前
善学以致用应助小白菜采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
无心发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
NexusExplorer应助wg采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
威武的念波完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
三生一陌发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
hsbuuwqbdubeq发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
长安完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
扶光完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
chen发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
山高发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ysm完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
现实的从菡完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
胡楠发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
霜之哀伤发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
烟花应助小狗乖乖怪采纳,获得10
9秒前
熬夜小猫完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
小段完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
changping应助闪闪的鸭子采纳,获得10
10秒前
诚心雁丝发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
潇洒冬日完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
young完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
落晖发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
djejje发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
Artificial Intelligence driven Materials Design 600
Comparing natural with chemical additive production 500
Investigation the picking techniques for developing and improving the mechanical harvesting of citrus 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5193933
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4376236
关于积分的说明 13628897
捐赠科研通 4231184
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2320812
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1319105
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1269416